The tragic murder of Chandra Levy.

Home

News

Sex Scandal

Scandal Mongers

Monroe

Leadership

Chandra Levy

Chandra Levy:
She wanted to be a CIA or an FBI Agent, and while the CIA and the FBI will miss the oppportunity to have her, they should take the time to know about her.

Primary Motive: Chandra Levy died because her integrity was not subject to compromise.

Wednesday May 22, 2002

By BOB WHITE and CYNDI SMITH
nsnews staff

The remains of Chandra Levy were found in Rock Creek Park today, 387 days after she went missing. Why were they found? Simple. They were found there because the people who are responsible for the murder of Chandra Levy wanted them to be found. How do we know that? Simple. The Police had scoured Rock Creek Park and they had failed to turn up any trace of Chandra Levy. Are they so incompetent that they missed finding the remains during their exhaustive searches? Not likely. The Police had searched extensively in the very same area where Chandra's body was found, but arrogant, professional killers have absolutely no doubt about their capacity to get away with murder, and if they were pressured to close the book on the Chandra Levy murder mystery, they did not disappoint. Police cadets standing shoulder to shoulder had combed the area where Chandra Levy's body was found, and it is safe to assume that her arrogant killer or killers deliberately placed the body at Rock Creek Park because they wanted somebody to find it. Rock Creek Park is a public place that is frequented by all kinds of people, and planting a body there has the potential to create a multitude of confusing impressions. It can, for example, create the impression that Chandra Levy's disappearance was a freak, motivation-free crime. One plausible scenario of planting the body at Rock Creek Park is that Chandra Levy was jogging when she had a chance encounter with a pervert who raped and murdered her. But if this scenario is vaguely plausible, it doesn't make any sense, under close scrutiny. If Chandra Levy's disappearance was a random murder of the sort that discovering a body at Rock Creek Park suggests, then Chandra Levy's body would have been found a very long time ago. Most realistic scenario; Chandra Levy's disappearance was a meticulously planned crime and moving the remains to Rock Creek Park, a location where they would certainly be discovered, was a deliberate attempt to create a false impression about the disappearance of Chandra Levy. For example, instead of a professional killing, Chandra Levy's murder was arguably a matter of being at the wrong place at the wrong time -or try any other number of potential possibilities. Nice try, but 'meticulous professionals' ultimately betray themselves because they are all too frequently, too meticulous for their own good. It's not the crime, it's the cover up stupid.

The people who made Chandra Levy disappear without a trace were too professional for their own good. They made Chandra Levy's body disappear without a trace for 387 days and then they made it magically reemerge in a "remote" area of Washington DC. The only problem is, there is no remote area in Washington D.C. And even if we accept the suggestion that it was indeed a "remote" area, it had been thoroughly combed, and returning the remains was ultimately a mistake. Bad mistake.

Now that the cover up has been publicly aired on CNN, as every cover up usually is, we will draw the only conclusions that are realistically plausible, and we will let history be the ultimate judge of what realy happened to Chandra Levy. Sleep tight beautiful lady. You would have made an incredible CIA or FBI agent, and this world will miss you. We cannot bring you back, but we can make it very clear to the ignorant creeps who are responsible for your murder, that we know exactly who they are, we know exactly how they operate, we know exactly what they are capable of and we know exactly what to do, to smoke them out of their holes. And you can rest assured that they will spend the rest of their lives looking over their shoulders. Sleep tight Chandra Levy. The well funded cabal that exploits vulnerable people like Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones for political purposes, is responsible for the disappearance of Chandra Levy, and their private investigators can spend the rest of their lives trying to cover their tracks. But since the murder of Chandra Levy, any private investigator who advances the cause of a 'sex scandal' cabal, should require a good defence attorney.

We do not have a crystal ball that enables us to disclose the minute detail of the murder of Chandra Levy. All we can do is tell Chandra's story the way she would have told it if she were alive. Her only 'crime' was that she had a relationship with a married Congressman in a world where sex is used as a weapon to destroy the political careers of otherwise invulnerable politicians. If Chandra Levy was willing to use details of her sexual relationship with Congressman Gary Condit, to destroy his political career, Chandra Levy would have been every media network's media darling when she was alive, but Chandra Levy was a caring, compassionate and decent human being. As long as she was alive, Chandra Levy denied the opportunity to create a sex scandal to destroy Gary Condit, and the 'meticulous professionals' who are responsible for her disappearance, do not understand the meaning of the words "back off". The creeps who are responsible for the disappearance of Chandra Levy are capable of taking a happy, intelligent, well adjusted independent woman like Chandra Levy, and destroying her for the sake of scoring political points. That is what it took to destroy Gary Condit's 3 decade record of success as a Congressman, and make no mistake about it, Chandra Levy did not want anyhting to do with the creepy, politically motivated extremists who routinely exploit real and/or imagined sexual relationships, for political purposes.

Chandra Levy was a strong, intelligent, happy, well adjusted, independent young woman who was looking forward to the rest of an exciting life and the last thing she wanted or needed was to be associated with a sex scandal. In the final analysis, it is ultimately an insult to the memory of Chandra Levy, to suggest that Gary Condit murdered her to cover up an affair, because in the absence of outside interference, Chandra Levy and Gary Condit had absolutely nothing to cover up.

We blame the media for associating Chandra Levy's name with a sex scandal, and we make it very, very clear that the opportunity to get away with murder is not an option, in a world where the integrity of people like Chandra Levy is allowed to shine.

The media would like to suggest that Gary Condit murdered Chandra Levy because he was a popular Congressman who wished to destroy his own political career, but isn't that an exceedingly preposterous theory? If anybody had ever presented the slightest evidence to suggest that Gary Condit was in fact guilty of murdering Chandra Levy, we would join the bandwagon. But Gary Condit has been under the microscope long enough to confidently say that he is clearly not guilty of anything beyond having had sex with Chandra Levy and of doing what most men do under his circumstances -deny a sexual relationship until the 'sex police' prove their mettle.

The media has absolved Gary Condit as a murder suspect in the death of Chandra Levy, not because that was the intention, but because the media has proved that it does not have the power to do anything beyond a DNA analysis of a semen-stained dress. But as all reasonable people clearly understand, real FBI and CIA agents are competent, criminal investigators, they are not panty sniffers. Chandra Levy would have made a terrific CIA or FBI agent, she will be dearly missed and we salute her. Sleep tight beautiful lady and may God give your wonderful parents the strength and the wisdom to admire you, not only for the beautiful person the Levys' raised, but also for the incredible woman Chandra Levy would have become, had she been permitted to live her life. God Bless Chandra Levy.

Those who are suddenly lost or seized, report later that their greatest fear was that no one would know what had happened to them. Don't worry Chandra. We know what happened and we know why it happened, and anybody who would like to distort the record, is free to try.

And by the way, all the behind-the-scenes 'experts' who organized the incredible, CNN media circus on May 22nd 2002, produced a beautifully orchestrated presentation. We are talking about a calibre of people who have the talent and the capacity to produce a James Earl Ray or a Lee Harvey Oswald, to make the simple truth as obscure as possible. The traditional capacity to pervert justice is well established, but in the case of Chandra Levy's mysterious disappearance, Chandra Levy's brutal murder and Chandra Levy's magical re-emergence, the cover up is too obvious to deny and any further effort to scapegoat, ads insult to injury. Regardless, in the final analysis, Chandra Levy gets the last laugh because as long as her courage and her integrity is acknowledged, Chandra Levy did not die in vain. Chandra Levy was a very aware, a very intelligent and a very astute young lady who was full of life, and it is our privilege to pass her torch to people who are as full of life as she was -and all the rest do not really matter. Thanks to Chandra, as far as we are concerned, this case is closed. We are not law enforcement. We do not have the power to control criminal prosecutions. All we can do is to tell Chandra's story to the best of our abilities, and hope that competent authorities rise to the level of the astute, intelligent young woman that Chandra Levy was.

Since we published our views about Chandra Levy, on the day that her remains were found, we have been
overwhelmed by a torrent of email that has literally flabergasted us. It is as if we were all waiting for the
slightest clue to emerge, so that we could collectively blow off the level of steam required, to bring Chandra
back. The hope was not entirely in vain, because you have managed to bring her spirit back, and that is the
impression that we get when we read messages like the following email;

Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT)

From: "Rick Turpin"

To: newsworld@yahoo.com

I don't get it. I was watching CNN yesterday and prior to the discovery
of Chandra Levy's body, everybody was calling her death a murder. When
her body was found, it was called a 'death investigation'. I understand
the attempt to give forensics the opportunity to provide an indisputable
conclusion, but this absolute abandonment of every semblance of reason
was eerily creepy. Larry King even went so far as to say "she could have
been jogging and had a heart attack right?" Give us a break. This reporting
is one step below the National Enquirer, and this so called 'death investigation'
is living proof that the media is sleepwalking on this one.

Thank You for reporting the truth, and under the circumstances, it is an
understatement to say that your reporting is refreshing because you are
the only people who are in fact reporting. I used to rely on CNN for the
news but it has become comic relief -except the reporting on the Chandra
Levy case is very sad and disappointing. I hope there is a change, for the
sake of others because I have stopped watching. The Internet has become
my preferred choice for news and information.

thanks for the news

We share the frustration of readers who, in our estimation, reflect the simple, common sense of people who
are informed and we do not understand how somebody like CNN can be so out of touch. On May 23rd, CNN
aggressively spun stories that Chandra Levy had been murdered while jogging, and even showcased an
overzealous Prosecutor who wanted to force a confession out of a petty criminal who was serving a 10 year
prison sentence for trying to assault two female joggers. Needless to say, CNN has no trouble slandering a
proven loser who is serving time for being beaten up by the women he failed to assault, but it is folly to blame
this criminal for making Chandra Levy disappear. When CNN challenged our sanity with their reporting, we
researched newsgroup public opinion, and this is what we found;

Date: 2002-05-23 07:53:56 PST
(Steve Franklin) wrote in news:dd60515e.0205230422.33e312f@posting.google.com:
Also might make it less likely that Condit is responsible since it's hard to imagine
a scenario where he killed her while she was jogging.

Talk about leaping to conclusions. That's what this case has been
about all along: the incredible ability of people, even the so-called
investigators of the police, to swallow whatever cover story the
perpetrators of this crime have constructed without so much as the
hint of a questioning thought.

Have you looked at a map? Are you telling me Chandra levy *jogged*
from her apartment at New Hampshire and M Street to a point in the
park north of Brandywine? That's a distance of about 3 1/2 miles as
the crow flies, and a good 4 1/2 miles on the ground--the park twists
and turns. That's 9 miles round trip assuming she was planning on
turning around at that very spot, which she probably wasn't. Was she
practicing for a marathon or something? If not, then she got to that
point in some manner other than running all the way there.

Who says she ran there? Bodies can be transported.

Conclusion? There are other people involved in this who are counting
on the utter lunk-headedness of the police.

Needless to say, the disparity between media reports and simple common sense is glaringly obvious. We can go
on and on extolling the common sense of ordinary people, and we have done nothing more than provide a tiny
sample of the reaction that the Chandra Levy case is producing. We can continue to allow CNN to dazzle us with
the dramatic, and absolutely useless "breaking news" bulletins, which facilitate the plot to cover up the truth
about the murder of Chandra Levy, or we can accept the simple fact that the questions that you raise are what
must be answered, to get to the bottom of the Chandra Levy murder. The following email illustrates the point:

From: "David Sween"

To: newsworld@yahoo.com

Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 14:14:37 -0500

I will keep this email as short as possible, and just remember that the
length is dictated by the lapse that media distortions have produced.

First and foremost, the body of evidence has been replaced by skeletal
remains, and the challenge to flesh out an accurate portrait is so immense
that it is absolutely not possible, outside the focus of an intelligent,
impeccable, thorough and competent investigation. The circumstances of the Levy
disappearance are complex, disturbing and dominated by the obsession to cover up
a murder, and in this particular case, the so called forensic evidence is incidental.

Untrained investigators do not understand the limits of science, and to keep a long
story short, forensic science corroborates, it does not define probable cause. Needless
to say, the capacity to solve the Levy murder mystery relies upon the capacity to
determine the reason behind the murder of Chandra Levy. Competent investigators draw
reasonable conclusions, they are not blinded by the mindless dictum that scientific
facts produce.

Savvy, veteran homicide investigators understand the fact that planting a gun in the
hand of an alleged suicide victim simulates the authority of science and distorts the
truth at the same time. A reliable verdict relies upon the ability to distinguish the
reality from the appearance that cover up artists rely upon, to get away with murder.

The death of Chandra Levy was not a random killing. Chandra Levy was not robbed
and she jogged on a treadmill, not in Rock Creek park, where her disintegrated
remains were conveniently placed, to permit the preposterous speculation that a
known criminal who was convicted for failing to assault two joggers, is responsible
for the murder of Chandra Levy. The obsession to close the book on this one is
absolutely paranoid, but in a competent murder investigation, the only relevance of
competing theories is the one that survives, it is not the one that is convenient.

Chandra Levy's remains were placed under a foot of leaves to create the impression
that her body was in Rock Creek Park since she disappeared, and that is the sort of
forensic tampering that betrays the mindset of arrogant murderers.

Chandra Levy's murderers think they are very sophisticated and that they have successfully
stymied public scrutiny and forensic scientists because they managed to keep the body hidden
for 387 days. You can deny forensic scientists the opportunity to do their work and you can
fill the gap with preposterous theories, but it takes a reliable verdict to survive the light
of scrutiny.

Chandra Levy's murderers planted skeletal remains at Rock Creek park because they thought that
the body had disintegrated towards the opportunity to confuse and to limit a conclusive
investigation. But it is not even remotely possible to disguise a murder because the victims
are never forgotten, tampering with the evidence is never natural, and intent is always
transparent. Criminals are defined by intent, not by their actions, and the loser who failed
to assault two joggers is in prison because he betrayed his intent. You don't even need a body
to prosecute the people who are responsible for the murder of Chandra Levy.

Arrogant murderers never fail to leave a trail of undeniable evidence. They have proven their
capacity to make a body disappear without a trace, and 387 days is clearly more than enough
time to convince even the biggest skeptic. The preposterous suggestion that a search party combed
the area immediately to the left of where Chandra Levy's remains were found, they combed the
area immediately to the right of where Chandra Levy's remains were found, but they missed the spot
where Chandra's body lay, is absolutely ludicrous. On May 26, 2001, police sent dogs into the
Rock Creek Park area where there is heavy underbush and they were not looking for Chandra Levy's
skeletal remains. The suggestion that the Police failed to locate the fly infested mess of maggots
that they would have found if Chandra Levy had been murdered on the spot, is quite astounding.
And even if the Police had not searched the area, it is not possible to hide a body for 387 days
in an area that is frequented by all kinds of people, including adventurous Scouts who did not
receive the instruction to hike to the left and to the right of where Chandra Levy's remains were
dumped. Abandon the obsession to create the impression that Chandra Levy's death was a random
killing, because it is an absolutely preposterous suggestion.

Remember when Levy family lawyer Billy Martin said Chandra couldn't have been the victim of a random
attack because if she were, her body would have been found but after eight months, he was sure she
was a victim of a "well-planned kidnapping and removal"? Billy Martin knew what he was talking about,
and you cannot change the simple facts by trying to create the false impression that Billy Martin
was wrong. When the Police searched Levy's apartment on May 6, 2001, her luggage was packed and her
driver's license, money and credit cards were inside her wallet. Chandra Levy was getting ready to
leave town when she was abducted and murdered and then, her desperate killers dumped her remains
because the pursuit never waned and all they could do is seek to throw the hounds off. Needless to
say, if Chandra's parents did not aggressively pursue them, they would have never returned the body,
but that's what desperate killers do.

Cover up artists are absolutely predictable because they do not have the scope or the capacity to do
anything beyond seek to pervert justice. If a private investigator like myself breaks into your home
and steals your camera, allows you to spend a month looking for your camera without success and if I
break into your home again a month later to return your camera, you will sit around scratching your
head and assume that you had failed to locate a camera that was lying in plain site. That's what the
Police are currently doing, they are sitting around scratching their heads, and it is time for them
to begin to investigate the murder of Chandra Levy. It is easy to place a foot of leaves over the
remains of Chandra Levy's body, to give 'forensic lunacy' a chance or to simulate a 'shallow grave'
but archaeologists examine the disturbed soil of a shallow grave, they do not count leaves or assume
that the body disintegrated on the spot, because the leaves fell off the tree such a long time ago.

When all of the evidence is carefully scrutinized, there is one and only one motivation which adequately
explains the murder of Chandra Levy, and it is time to stop pretending that the maggots do not exist.

And who are the maggots? The maggots are the cabal that is responsible for "conferencing" the sophisticated
plot to cover up the brutal murder of Chandra Levy. "They" is the people who clearly understand their
capacity to replace forensic science with forensic lunacy."They" is the people who think that placing
a foot of leaves over Chandra Levy's remains will create an undisturbed crime scene. But the 'forensic
lunacy' that "they" deliberately propose is so absolutely preposterous, that "they" ultimately betray
absolutely nothing beyond a glaringly transparent cover up.

Under these circumstances, it does not take a genius to figure out the fact that Rock Creek Park is a
secondary crime scene. Chandra Levy was murderd and conveniently dumped at Rock Creek Park because "they"
wanted to expand the scope of murder suspects, but a professional disappearance does not expand, it limits.

Under all of the unusual circumstances which prove that Chandra Levy died at the hands of an organized
murderer, there is one and only one motivation that makes any sense at all, to explain the obsession with
Chandra Levy. Chandra Levy was murdered because that was the only way to exploit the private, sexual
relationship that she and Congressman Gary Condit shared. We live in a world where a bimbo like Paula Jones
dominated the publicity of President Clinton's presidency, and anybody who doubts the carefully orchestrated
reversal of the failure to turn Chandra Levy into the latest sex scandal poster child as long as she was
alive, will never get it. Chandra Levy was so secretive about her relationship with Congressman Condit that
even her parents were not told, and that invariably disturbed a sex scandal cabal that is so absolutely
obsessive that it would not hesitate to threaten to put somebody like Chandra in jail, for refusing to
acknowledge a sexual relationship. Needless to say, the effort to use a sex scandal to destroy the political
career of Congressman Gary Condit is not surprising, and as long as Chandra Levy refused to cooperate, the
obsession to control her is too obvious to deny.

If people like Rex Armistead are powerful and cunning enough to get away with targeting the President of the
United States through the mysterious 'Arkansas Project', how easy is it to manipulate the life of a single,
vulnerable girl like Chandra Levy? We have seen how easy it was to destroy the life of Chandra Levy, but it
is absolutely not possible to successfully manufacture the circumstances surrounding the murder of Chandra Levy.

The key to bringing Chandra Levy's murderers to justice is the answer to the question; "Who knew about the
private sexual relationship between Chandra Levy and Gary Condit when Chandra was alive and who was seeking
to use this relationship to destroy Gary Condit's political viability?" A complete and thorough response to
that question will lead directly to the people who are responsible for the murder of Chandra Levy.

The anatomy of the contrived, Washington sex scandal has not fundamentally changed since 1962, when
Marilyn Monroe was allegedly murdered because she carried a Kennedy baby -it was either John's or Robert's,
it didn't matter which brother was slandered because one was considered to be the extension of the other.
Chandra Levy and Gary Condit are merely the latest victims of the traditional, Washington sex scandal, and the
repeatedly persistent claim that Chandra Levy was pregnant, reflects the fact.

I am just an investigator, I do not have the power to solve this crime, and if the Police want any information
from me, I will spare them the effort. Why am I so absolutely convinced about the fact that everthing in this
email is absolutely not disputable. When Chandra Levy vanished without a trace, I was absolutely certain that
her body would never be found. Under the circumstances, the most astute investigators reached the same conclusion.
What I did not realize is that Chandra Levy's killers would be dumb enough to bring the body back. Everybody makes
mistakes, and that is all it really takes, to solve any pre-meditated homicide.

The Police can spend the next 25 years excavating Rock Creek Park, and they will still fail to identify Chandra Levy's killers,
unless the evidence they find is linked to a reasonable theory.

David Sween

NEWSWORLD SHOWDOWNnsnews