Magnetic field of Earth should also change and it can be
monitored at fluxgate magnetometer, built by the University
of Alaska, Geophysical Institute, operating at the
HAARP ionospheric observatory in Gakona,Alaska
Click between lines, then click on HAARP
under Earth's Magnetic Field at there web site.
-------------------------------------------------------- HAARP ionospheric observatory in Gakona,Alaska --------------------------------------------------------- synthetic food research ---------------------------------------------------------
Neutrinos come from nuclear reactions and can past all the way through Earth. There are a Trillion neutrinos going through our body each second from Sun even at night, but since they pass through and don�t stop we don�t notice it.
What I say is some of the neutrinos coming from the Sun are stopped at Earth core and heats Earth crust to 60 degrees. Without going into whole theory, the Earths core stops neutrinos for long period of time then reaches threshold and stop being stopped and heat stops coming from core(Earth goes into Ice Age). It may take 3 years for the Temperature of Earth to decrease 40F(from ice samples from greenland of last Ice Age) or 10F per year.As the North and South poles cool this will give rise to a larger than normal temperature difference between Poles and Equator causing more wind flow causing more heat from friction of wind keeping temperatures normal at first masking start of Ice Age! After (3-4 years?) at that point the magnetic field of Earth goes to zero and then reemerges reversed in opposite direction. The neutrinos are stopped in core again and Earth comes out of Ice Age.
The North & South Pole and High Mountains would feel effects of
loss of heat coming from Earths core first.
Increase wind flow at start of Ice Age keeping
temperatures normal could mask start of Ice Age.
I am saying from the unusal winds and Hurricanes we see now
we are entering Ice Age Now.
The result of no magnetic field.
The magnetic field of Earth protects Earth from harmful radiation in the form of radio active particles(This may be a good time to put lead back in gasoline,putting lead in air to protect us from radiation). It traps radioactive particles from Sun many miles above Earth in the layers of magnetic field. During times of high concentration of radioactive particles coming from Sun (Solar Flare of Sun, every 11 years) some of the radioactive particles leak out of magnetic field in Northern parts and produce the effect of Northern Lights.Loss of Magnetic field in Ice Age would result in large energy to evaporate water at equator and result in 1000 foot snow deposits in North and South Poles in Winter.
With 40 degree Fahrenheit temperature change in Ice Age (from core samples of ice in Iceland from last Ice Age). This could set the stage for tremendous snow fall (up to 1000 feet in Northern Areas where there are marks of Glaciers and deposits) in winter as equator could get hot with added radiation from radioactive particles(creating more clouds) and North, 40 degrees colder than normal.
According to my theory,neutrinos
(they can go all the way through Earth)
are stopped in deep layers of Earths
crust from nuclear reaction of Sun,
and produce heat keeping Earth's crust
at 60 degrees.After about 100,000
years it reaches a threshold and
can't stop any more neutrinos thus heat
stops coming from deep crust,and we go
into ice age until magnetic field
of Earth reverses(10,000 to 100,000 years?).
The Sun stops 1`/3 of neutrinos
produced by it's nuclear reaction,
in Sun's core, and reaches threshold
every 11 years, producing Solar Flare
and the magnetic field of Sun reverses.
The Earth Stops neutrinos coming
from Sun
on Earth in its core and in doing this
it produces heat keeping Earth crust at
60 degrees until it reaches threshold
and during this time the Earth goes into
Ice Age(when Earths was young and crust
was thin their was eruptions blew dust
all over Earth causing great extinctions
from eruption of Earths core(you can look
at dark side of moon and Mars and see where
the eruption shot through thin crust and later
eruption when crust was thicker in same place
but smaller crater, as older eruption has more
meterite crators)
but now crust is thick and holds back
eruptions,(El Nino). a compression of energy in core.
I am working on three plans
1. SYNTHETIC FOOD
for this plan to work we need nuclear
power or natural gas
to make electricity to separate
water into Hydrogen and Oxygen and then
the Hydrogen can be reacted with carbon
dioxide to make sugar and
synthetic food for cattle.
also doing research on
2.HEATING EARTH WITH HIGH ALTITUDE FIXED
POSITION SOLAR POWERED BALLOONS OVER
NORTH POLE, WITH SO MANY THE REFLECTED
LIGHT WOULD HEAT EARTH TO NORMAL SUMMER
TEMPERATURE,FOR NORMAL GROWING SEASON
summer(2005) putting a billion
solar powered balloons at high altitude
above the north pole,a fixed position
reflecting light down and with that
light reflected from balloons will heat
Earth giving the North the heat for normal
growing season.
3. Making Synthetic Oil in super large amounts &
the using of this Oil would warm Earth
in Ice Age
Introduction to the Neutrino Report
Their was a calculation done about 50 years ago that showed that 1/3 of the neutrino�s from the nuclear reaction of the sun were missing(they measured the neutrino�s from Sun and their were 1/3 less than their should have been from theoretical calculations).
-
The US government under the impression that a nuclear discovery could be made if truly their was 1/3 of neutrinos really missing, and put Dr. John Bachall in charge of checking all calculations, and to develop a very accurate sensor for sensing neutrinos.
-
After spending 30 years checking all calculations and building the most accurate neutrino sensor, Dr John Bachall said �yes, 1/3 of the neutrinos are missing from Sun�s nuclear reaction�!
-
Now upon a close examination of the missing neutrino problem, come to find out that there are many different energy levels of neutrinos and Dr. John Bachall only measured a few of many different neutrino energy levels and assumed the rest of many different energy levels of neutrinos also had 1/3 less than they should.
-
So they came to think that neutrinos had mass and the high energy level Dr. Bachall was measuring 1/3 of them were oscillating with lower energy neutrinos, on the way here from the Sun, thus Dr. Bachall measured 1/3 less of the high energy neutrinos, but the low energy level neutrinos, that he didn�t check, could have 1/3 more.
-
Now to check the low energy neutrinos, they built Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada (SNO), and even though the numbers were not quit as they expected, they though they were close enough to say, 1/3 of neutrinos are not missing but, 1/3 of high energy neutrinos are oscillating and buy the time they reach Earth from Sun are low energy neutrinos (but couldn�t account for 100% of neutrinos).
-
During this time (1987) their was a Super Nova and the neutrinos of explosion and light of explosion arrived at Earth the same time and since light has no mass, neutrinos also must have no mass or they would have arrived at different times.
-
So if neutrinos have no mass they can�t be oscillating (they must have mass to oscillate), so what is going on here?
-
A new definition of light must be introduced �Light is gravitational pull being vibrated, and has no mass�. Now with my new definition of light you would expect a change of energy of neutrinos. If a long rope hanging from high point, and the high point represented the gravitational flux at Sun (tight rope) and loose end, the gravitational flux at Earth, you would expect if you plucked the rope at high point that sent a wave down the rope, the nature of wave would change by the time it reached the loose end.
-
So we are right back where we started from, 1/3 of neutrino are missing from Sun and I say that their is a thing called nuclear force crystal in the core of Sun that is stopping 1/3 of neutrinos (this is atoms that instead of normal chemical bonds, have nuclear bonds between atoms, and with its high density can stop a percentage of neutrinos (we don�t know any normal material that will stop a large percentage of neutrinos as they can go through Earth)).
-
I say this nuclear force crystal in core of Sun stops 1/3 of neutrinos on Sun for 11 years and reaches threshold then erupts into Solar Flare and magnetic field of Sun changes, and the same thing happened on Earth (nuclear force crystal in core of Earth reaches threshold and erupts) until the crust got thick stopping eruptions, now we go into ice age during this transition period)
--
Introduction to calculation: If we knew the total number of neutrinos stopped in the core every 11 years and the size of suns core we could calculate the neutrinos per cubic mile of core, a constant number of neutrinos that a cubic mile of core stops and then reaches threshold and erupts.
Number of neutrinos stopped per cubic mile of Suns core before it reaches threshold = 2.34 X 10 Superscript 30
---
Now if you take this number and put in a factor for smaller gravity of Earth(as strong gravity of Sun would hold back eruption more than on Earth), you could find the threshold or number of neutrinos per cubic mile of Earths core , Suns constant times percent less gravity(it would have to only reach 1/28 as high threshold as the sun gravity is 28 times stronger) of Earth = Earths threshold constant.
It takes 11 years for neutrinos to buildup in core of Sun and erupt into flare, the time for Earths and Moons core is:
One Earths core would stop .3% of neutrinos coming from Sun
And it would take about 100,000 years for the Earths core per cubic mile of core to reach 1/28 the threshold of Sun
The moon would take 20,000 years.
---
Energy of core flares of Sun, Earth and Moon:
Finding average energy of neutrino, and multiplying times total neutrinos being stored in core needed to reach threshold.
Energy of Solar Flare of Sun 2.7446 X 10 Superscript 17 Megaton
Energy of Earth core Flare 9.9193 X 10 Superscript 9 Megaton
Energy of Moon core Flare 9.234 X 10 Superscript 7 Megaton
---
If the thick crust of Moon got so thick(having no atmosphere would make Moons surface cold solidifying deep magma, making crust thick) that held back the core Flares of Moon�s core for one Billion years the Energy would be .03 Trillion Megatons, enough to raise 1/100,000 of moons mass to fusion temperature, igniting Moon and burst into fusion(Sending out also burst of Cosmic Rays). Since the Moon doesn�t have the gravity to hold fusion it will hit Earth, lighting Earth on fusion unless (Earth Moon Balance Satellite Defense) is employed.
---
Earth Moon Balance Satellite Defense: This is a 40,000 megaton bomb balanced in orbit between Earth and Moon, set to go off when Moon burst into fusion and fusion hits bomb, exploding bomb thus separating the fusion and keeping it from hitting Earth. Otherwise the fusion hitting Earth would ignite Earth on fusion on one side, shooting Earth like a rocket until it�s at comet speed and fusion goes out.
---
From Astrophysics we know large areas of dust form into Galaxies, so starting from dust the steps the Sun, Earth and Moon go through to be what they are now.
Earth and Moon start out as balls of dust. The center due to pressure and natural radioactivity in dust melts and due to pressure, bonds are formed between nucleases forming high density nuclear force crystal. The Electrons are forced to leave there orbits around only one nuclease and now go around all the nucleases that are bonded, forming a small magnetic field. This nuclear force crystal starts stopping neutrinos and gets hot melting all the dust. The nuclear force crystal reaches threshold and stops stopping neutrino for a while, cooling the Earth or Moon long enough to harden a layer on surface forming a thin crust. Then a large eruption of the core (looks like solar flare) shoots through thin crust. After eruption is over the hole in crust solidifies, but leaves a crater looking area 1/5 the size of Earth or Moon. Each time the core reaches threshold and erupts it blows through crust but leaving a smaller hole as crust is thicker, and alternate to opposite side of planet each eruption. Finally crust gets so thick the eruption can�t break through. We know this from 65 million years ago the extinction of Dinosaurs(eruption of Earths core blowing through crust leaving a layer of dust all over Earth). But now we have Ice Ages(core of Earth reaching threshold and stop stopping neutrinos for a while and cools Earth) and there is no layer of dust in snow in polar regions in that time period of recent Ice Ages.
---
Sun gets lit with fusion by a chain of events. First the Moon of a planet that it�s crust has got so thick that it has been stopping eruptions of core of Moon and it has been doing this for a billion years, burst into fusion and fusion hits planet it is orbiting, lights the planet with fusion on one side, shooting the planet like a rocket with burning fusion. Now if that burning planet with fusion hits the unlit sun, it will light it with fusion. If you say the chances of that happening is 1/9, of any of the precomets (burning planet with fusion) lighting the unlit Sun of a solar system, that would mean that 8/9 of Suns never got lit and explain dark matter. For every lit Sun (Star you see) there are 8 that are not!
---
---------------------------------------------
The basic idea of Neutrino Report is: 1/3 of the neutrinos coming from sun are missing. Neutrinos come from nuclear reactions and come from sun and can go all the way through Earth. Every 11 years there is a solar flare of sun, so what I say is something in core of sun that stops 1/3 of them for 11 years until the core can�t hold any more and erupts in a solar flare!Also the magnetic field of Sun reverses at this time.
Basic idea of Neutrino Report is: ---------------------------------------------
Basic idea of neutrinos on Earth: The basic affect of neutrinos on Earth is they come from sun and are stopped in core of Earth,producing heat in core of Earth keeping Earth's crust at 60 degrees until it reaches its threshold every 100,000 years and can't stop any more neutrinos for 1000 to 10,000 years until the magnetic field of Earth changes and during this time stops producing heat in core starting Ice Age.
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
The Neutrino Report is all about a calculation, taking the amount of neutrinos that are blocked in the Suns core every 11 years and dividing by the cubic miles of Sun�s core to get a constant, the threshold or number of neutrinos per cubic mile of Sun�s core blocks before it erupts into a Solar Flare, and magnetic field of Sun reverses.
------------------------------------------------
Then taking this constant and dividing it by 28 as Earths gravity is 1/28 of Suns and will be easer to erupt here as Earth has less gravity holding it back and now you have the threshold constant per cubic mile for Earth�s core. Then calculating the time it will take for Earths core to reach this threshold (blocking neutrinos coming from Sun) and show that it coincides with time it takes for Earths magnetic field to reverse proving this is the process of magnetic field changing on Earth.
--------------------------------------------------
First we start off with the number of neutrinos that from John Bachall�s book on Solar Neutrinos he theoretical calculates the correct number of neutrinos that should be coming from Sun.
-----------------------------------------
Multiplying 6.6054 x 10 Superscript 10 cm-2 sec-1 X 6.4516 =
4.26153 x 10 Superscript 11 � This is the predicted(Theoretical) Neutrinos per square inch, per second on Earth.
------------------------------------------------
But we know 1/3 are missing, so we multiply this number by .6666 and get the number that actually arrive at Earth.
4.26153 x 10 Superscript 11 X .6666 = 2.8407 x 10 Superscript 11 Neutrinos per square inch per second on Earth form Sun.
---------------------------------------
Now change square inches to square miles,
12 X 12 = 144 inches per square foot
2.8407 x 10 Superscript 11 X 144 = 4.0907 x 10 Superscript 13
------------------------------------------
1 mile = 5280 feet
square mile = 5280 X 5280 = 27878400
4.0907 x 10 Superscript 13 X 27878400 = 1.1404 x 10 Superscript 21 Neutrinos per square mile per second
-----------------------------------------
Then make a ball with the radius of 92,957,130 miles would have a surface area of
S = 4(3.14)R Superscript 2
S = 4(3.14) 92,958,1302 Superscript 2 = 1.0858 x 10 Superscript 17 square miles.
-----------------------------------------
Times the neutrinos per square mile,
1.858 x 10 Superscript 17 X 1.1404 x 10 Superscript 21 = 1.2383 x 10 Superscript 38 Total Neutrinos coming from Sun per second.
--------------------------------------------
Total number of neutrinos coming from Sun per second times seconds in year
1.2383 x 10 Superscript 38 X 31536000 = 3.9052 x 10 Superscript 45
Times 11 years
3.9052 x 10 Superscript 45 X 11 = 4.2957 x 10 Superscript 46 Total neutrinos coming from Sun every 11 years, and we know 1/2 of that would be the number blocked in core every 11 years.
--------------------------------------------
4.2957 x 10 Superscript 46/ 2 = 2.1478 x 10 Superscript 46 This is the total neutrinos being blocked in core of Sun every 11 years.
Now to find the cubic miles of core of Sun and divide that into total number of neutrinos blocked every 11 years to get the number of neutrinos blocked per cubic mile of Sun�s core.
--------------------------------------------
V = 4/3(3.14) R3 With a Sun�s core radius of 129,742 , the cubic miles of Sun�s core is 9.1479 x 10 Superscript 15
----------------------------------------------
By dividing the total neutrinos blocked by total cubic miles of Sun�s core you get the threshold that every cubic mile of Sun�s core must reach before a Solar Flare.
-----------------------------------------------
2.1479 x 10 Superscript 46 / 9.14815 x 10 Superscript 15 = 2.3479 x 10 Superscript 30
-----------------------------------------------
With the Sun�s core stopping 1/3 of neutrinos and if you could see core, looking at Sun it would look like a bull�s eye, and the Sun�s core thickness should be able to stop all neutrinos behind it. If you made a cube out of the Sun�s core it would have a thickness of 210,000 miles being that the Sun�s core would have the same volume as a cube 210,000 by 210,000 by 210,000. So the Sun�s core thickness of 210,000 would stop all neutrinos, a cube made of the Earths core would have a thickness of 2100 miles, and divide by the Sun�s core thickness gives you .01 or the Earth would stop 1% of neutrinos from Sun.
---------------------------------------------------
Finding the area of Earths core, Area = D2 X .7864 and with Earths Diameter of 2608 miles, the area of Earths core is 5,348,828.6 square miles.
----------------------------------------------------
With the neutrinos per mile coming from Sun hitting Earth per cubic mile(from before calculation) of 1.404 x 1021 X 5,348,828.6 = 7.5098 x 10 Superscript 27 Total neutrinos hitting core or Earth per second.
----------------------------------------------------
The total neutrinos hitting Earth�s core times the percent being blocked (1%) equal-
7.5098 x 10 Superscript 27 X .01 = 7.5098 x 10 Superscript 25
----------------------------------------------------
A Volume of Earth�s core with a core radius of 1304 miles, would be
V = 4/3(3.14) R3 9.28798 x 10 Superscript 9
----------------------------------------------------
So the total number of neutrinos being blocked in Earth�s core per cubic mile of core is-
7.5098 x 10 Superscript 25 / 9.28798 x 109 = 8.08550406 x 10 Superscript 15
----------------------------------------------------
So we take the threshold a cubic mile of Sun�s core has to reach before a Solar Flare and divide it by 28 as gravity on Earth is 1/28th of Sun�s and we have the threshold the Earth�s core must reach before a core eruption.
----------------------------------------------------
2.3479 x 10 Superscript 30 / 28.092192 = 8.357 x 10 Superscript 28 This is the threshold Earth�s core per cubic mile must reach before and eruption.
----------------------------------------------------
Now we take that number and divide it by the number of neutrinos being blocked in Earth�s core per cubic mile per second and we get the number of seconds it would take for Earth�s core to reach the threshold and erupt, and also the time it takes between Earth�s magnetic field reversals
----------------------------------------------------
8.3578 x 10 Superscript 28 / 8.0855 x 10 Superscript 15 = 1.033677 x 10 Superscript 13 This is number of seconds, by dividing that by the seconds in year, you get number of years to reach threshold on Earth, erupt(if can break through crust, if thick crust like now,core stops stopping neutrinos for a while and heat stops coming from core for a while giving us Ice Age), and reverse magnetic field.
3.1014 x 10 Superscript 13 / 315360000 = 32,777 years
-------------------------------------------------------------
This about 33,000 years which is what Theoreticaly with no crust the Earth should change magnetic field. With thin crust of about a million years ago, from Dr Cox chart, there was a steady beat of about 100,000 years, Earths magnetic field would change. So the equation is right.
----------------------------------------------------
Over the last million years the crust got thicker, inhibiting eruptions and time between magnetic field changes of Earth is about 700,000 years and in cycle we are in now a 10,000 year change back. In other words an oscillation of Earths magnetic field of 10.000 years after the 700,000 year change.
----------------------------------------------------
About 10,000 years ago their was a 700,000 oscillation and is due to change back now(Dr Cox magnetic field chart of Earth).
------------------------------------------------- Dark matter is: Their was a calculation done that showed that if you took the mass of the stars that we see they would make up only 1/9 of the gravitational field strength that we feel. Or put another way, there is 8/9 missing mass to account for the gravity that we feel. They call this dark matter. Now when you see how stars are lit, giving off a planetary nebula, as in neutrino report you can see that the chance of that happening must be 1/9 or only 1/9 of the stars are lit. For every star you see, their 9 stars around it that aren�t lit! The way that a star is lit with fusion. The moon having a cold crust with no atmosphere produces a crust that holds back the eruption of its core at very early age and doing this for a billion years would have the energy to burst into fusion, fall on Earth, this would lite Earth with fusion on one side, shooting Earth like a rocket with the chance of 1 in 9 of it hitting the Sun, before the fusion goes out and it turns to comet. To keep this from happening a satellite must be balanced between Earth and Moon with 40,000 Megaton bomb, programmed to go off when the fusion from exploding Moon hits it, separating the fusion keeping it from hitting Earth.
Arguments for and against Ice Age caused by giant eruption of Earth that last 1000 to 10,000 years(Neutrino Report)vs. comet hitting Earth. It is commonly thought that a small comet hit the Earth's crust and left a layer of dust on most of Earth causing the extinction of dinosaurs but it can't explain Ice Ages that last for 1000s of years,because dust would settle in a few months. Only a continous giant eruption of Earth could keep dust in air for that long.It was continuos eruptions of Earth(1000 to 10,000 years) that brought about Ice Ages,the extinction of dinosaurs and many other extinctions.
The Original Neutrino Report 1995 is on links below and was done in a hurry but with this web site and 1995 Neutrino Report all major points are covered. Press link to get one page at a time.
--------------------------------------------- The Original Neutrino Report 1995 July/11/03
Robert T Bailey E-mail: rtbailey_99@yahoo.com
The Neutrino Report
Fermentation of Manure producing Crude Oil
Copyrights all rights reserved, please contact Robert T Bailey
at P O Box 9740 Alpine Texas 79831 if you are interested in copy right, and send money in good faith,and publication date.
I write this as it is not yet conclusive, but like the Buddha said �life is like a dream, who knows when it will end� , �pay your debts of gratitude so you don�t have to pay for them in hell� and �inscribe your life�
I have advanced from manure in spring water (no chlorine) in plastic bottles, being keep warm 100 degrees that produce a layer of oil floating on top in about 2 months, to a pressurized system.
The plastic bottles hold some pressure, and after about a year of room temperature seam to be producing more oil to the point that the water they are in looks oily.
5 gallon buckets full of manure and water my not hold hardly any pressure. After about 1 year of basically outdoor temperature seamed to produce a layer of coal floating on top!
One of first things wrong with the plastic bottle concept, is that in France they ferment heavy parts of grape to make wine by turning the bottle once a day. This keeps heavy parts of grape from stagnating on bottom. So the manure needs to be mixed or churned once a day in water will ferment faster.
The second thing is when you burn gasoline in engine it produces 200 psi. So I would think that if ferment ting of manure was under 200 psi. it would form faster. The samples I produced under pressure seam to evaporate fast, meaning I am producing something even though the samples were take in first month.
Page 1
The question was how to get it under 200 psi. Well I found that in a sealed container (that doesn�t rust, as it will stop the fermentation process) the manure and water (warm at 100 degrees) will produce gases and produce 200 psi.! Pressure seams to be holding at 200psi. but not absolutely sure, will be sure latter. If pressure goes over 250psi tanks are very expensive. One way I have found to hold pressure at about 125 is by adding some raw crude.
In the fermentation process the bacteria produce alcohol till the alcohol reaches a level that kills them, so by adding crude oil I may have slowed down the bacteria or may have bacteria in oil that forms oil faster, I will know latter.
Also adding yeast seams to increase the fermentation process, but will the chemicals produced be the same?
Galvanized pipe has a working pressure of about 125 psi
A Butane tank has working pressure of about 250 psi.
Now I am thinking that my original plastic bottles would build up pressure and leak gas. A low pressure system, which could be cheap, may need to bleed off pressure into a gas flame to keep from exhausting bacteria, and once the fermentation is further along, the exhaust gases could burn and even be used to keep tank at 100 degrees.
Would remnants of sugar cane plant that has 4% sugar content, feed to pigs, make good manure to ferment to produce crude oil? Yeah, I think because of its high sugar content, it could be the fastest fermenting to crude oil!
Page 2
Selective fermentation of crude oil distillates
(in this case, the aim is, not to distilled out, but form directly)
copyrights all rights reserved.
The fermentation of sugar generates alcohol. Sugar is a ring molecule and is dissolvable in water and digestible. Grass is made of cellulose which is sugar rings that are stuck together like coins. It isn�t dissolvable in water nor is it digestible.
The cow has two stomachs. The first stomach has a bacterium in it that can break down the cellulose into sugars. Then the second stomach puts the sugars into solution and they are digestible.
The bacterium doesn�t have time to break down all the grass into sugars but it is in the manure and finally will. So by keeping the manure in warm water it will break up all the cellulose. By adding yeast it will ferment under pressure to crude oil (if you let the pressure off that is produced (methane) it forms coal.
Page 1
When we find crude oil it has many forms, natural gas, and gasoline�.to heavy distillates like asphalt. This is a result of fermentation of manure under pressure.
So you put manure, spring water (no bacteria stopping chemicals like tap water has (chlorine)) and yeast in a 850 psi. fire extinguisher (Kidde) and keep warm at 100 degrees.
As pressure of fermentation builds it forms heaver distillates. So the first thing that is formed is methane and natural gas. This builds up pressure in your tank.
When you reach 425 psi. the pressure gauge will stop rising for a while till all the contents is gasoline.
Now if gasoline is what you want you can stop the fermentation process there and then you have pure gasoline and natural gas.
Page 2
If you continue it will form heaver molecules like kerosene(650 psi.), and each time it does the pressure gauge stops as it adds a lot of the heavier molecules but some of the gasoline still stays in solution.
In this case you will have to let natural gas off, distill out the gasoline, to get the kerosene. As you get higher pressures you form heavier molecules, it will require more distillation to separate them and you will have less and less of the light molecules like gasoline.
So to select the distillate that you want to form, start with�
Manure, spring water (no bacteria stopping chemicals like tap water has (chlorine)) and yeast in a 850 psi. Fire extinguisher (Kidde) and keep warm at 100 degrees.
Then add the pressure that it forms at and you will get that pure distillate.
So if you add pressure and start at 650 psi. you get pure kerosene!
Page 3
I e-mailed Chevron-Texaco;
"Since manure in water ferments and produces crude oil and we see what they had to do in New York state to keep manure particulates (sediments) out of river systems from polluting water from ranch and dairy farms is they had to put manure into tanks to let decay to keep out of rivers.
So these manure particulates are carried by river system and deposited once they reach the ocean at mouth of river! So all you have to do is to drill in ocean, at mouth of rivers and you get a great oil well!
Look at the Mississippi river and Rio Grand as they flows into ocean is where our most prolific oil wells are, there are many rivers flowing into ocean, let get them drilled! World wide, only a small portion of these river mouths have been drilled!"
John McArthur Bailey memorial synthetic sugar and fossil fuels(synthetic oil) process
Patent application number 10/270,767 Filling date 01/22/2003
When I was young my older brother Johnny showed me how to separate water into oxygen and hydrogen by using a 9 volt battery with two wires in water and covered the wires with aluminum foil and put salt in water. He put two bottles completely in water and lifted the bottles out of except the mouth of bottles and mounted them in that position and put one of the aluminum foil covered under each bottle, and in less than week one bottle was full of Hydrogen and the other with about half as much was full of Oxygen.
He removed the Oxygen bottle and quickly turned it right side up and carried it as Oxygen was heaver than air and would stay in bottle which it did, and he set on table. He lit on fire a long wood match diameter stick and then blew the fire out and with only a red glow of smoking ember he stuck the ember in the Oxygen bottle and it relit on fire proving that there was Oxygen in the bottle!
Then he removed the hydrogen bottle but carried it upside down as Hydrogen is lighter than air. He lit a match and placed it by the lip of jar and turned the bottle as to poor upside down, when the Hydrogen reached the match there was a large poof as the Hydrogen lit!
What I am trying to do is turn Carbon Dioxide and water to Sugar and Oxygen but found that 3CO2 +2H2 + C3H8 = C6O6H12 is possible, in a few steps.
(Carbon Dioxide � Hydrogenation)
Thermodynamics Entropy: When they first started studying chemical reactions they figured chemical reactions will go in the direction that would release heat (gas will burn to carbon dioxide and water, carbon dioxide and water will not turn to gas and oxygen naturally). But then they found some chemical reactions that get colder rather than release heat. So they came up with Entropy(Symbol = S). It is based on statistics. It can also be calculated from Heat capacity of a chemical, by dividing the heat capacity of the chemical, every degree from absolute zero to the temperature you are at but normally considered at 25 degrees C, and sum the results! Entropy always increases and never decreases. So if you calculate the entropy of gas and oxygen and then carbon dioxide and water, you find carbon dioxide and water has a higher entropy, so the chemical reaction will naturally go in the direction of gas and oxygen to carbon dioxide and water.
What I am trying to do is turn Carbon Dioxide and water to Sugar and Oxygen but found that 3CO2 +2H2 + C3H8 = C6O6H12 is possible!
Looking at the equation:
C6O6H12 + 6O2 = 6CO2 + 6H2O
Since Entropy only increases and never decreases, 6CO2 + 6H2O must have a higher Entropy than C6O6H12 + 6O2 , and since by adding sun light(heat) to 6CO2 + 6H2O will increase its temperature and Entropy and would make it even harder for it to go to lower Entropy of C6O6H12 + 6O2 . Because of this I have all ways argued that Sun light is not added to 6CO2 + 6H2O
to make C6O6H12 + 6O2 , but that Sun light is used to make electricity(photoelectric effect).
Now that electricity could be used to make H2 and O2 by letting the current flow through water, and the gases could be used to drive a chemical reaction in the direction of sugar from carbon dioxide
The chemical reaction C6O6H12 + 6O2 = 6CO2 + 6H2O will go in the direction of sugar and oxygen to carbon dioxide and water. We know the Entropy of each gas, C6O6H12 + 6O2 (6 X 230) = 6CO2 (6 X 210)+ 6H2O (6 X 180) leaving sugar with a Entropy that must be less than or About 1000.
Keeping in mind the high heat capacity of water and also its high Entropy because of this and the chemical reaction goes in the direction that has water, so lets see if we can get water on the product of chemical reaction and get the Entropy to be more on product side or close to that.
Now to reverse this process, to go from carbon dioxide and water to sugar and oxygen but lets change and use the water to be separated into H2 and O2 and then add H2 to CO2 , lets look at this equation:
4H2 + CO2 = CH4 + 2H2O The Entropy 4H2 + CO2 (About 700J/K)= Entropy CH4 + 2H2O(About 600J/K) Trying to go from Entropy 4H2 + CO2 (About 700J/K)-To - Entropy CH4 + 2H2O(About 600J/K) there is a decrease of Entropy of about 100 and a chemical reaction will go in the direction that Entropy will increase and there is two ways to accomplish this.
One way is to decrease the Entropy of 4H2 + CO2 (About 700J/K) by adding pressure to it giving it a lower Entropy than CH4 + 2H2O(About 600J/K). Now looking at this equation there is 5 moles on one side of equation and 3 moles on the other(product side) so by doing work(adding pressure to product side you could increase Entropy to product side and make the chemical reaction go in the direction of the product, and doing this in normal pressure of one atmosphere work will be done and could make reaction go forward to product side ).
The other way is to increase the temperature as you look at the heat capacities( symbol Cp )of reactance and the products and we know that Entropy can be calculated by dividing the heat capacity per degree Kelvin from absolute zero to temperature you are at. Now if you have something that has high heat capacity like water( Cp = 75) its Entropy will increase faster than Co2(Cp = 37), So lets look at the equation again Entropy 4H2 + CO2 (About 700J/K)= Entropy CH4 + 2H2O(About 600J/K) and lets look at the heat capacity of each 4H2 (Cp = 29 per mole or 116)+ CO2 (Cp = 37) and CH4 (Cp = 36) + 2H2O(Cp = 75 per mole or 150). Giving us 116 + 37 = 153 on one side of equation (reactance)and 36 + 150 = 186 on the other(products). So as you increase the temperature the products will gain in entropy and when the products have more Entropy than reactance the chemical reaction will go forward.
The simplest way to get Carbon Dioxide � Hydrogenation is to place carbonated water in a microwave and turn it on for a few minutes. The natural Ph in the water with the carbon dioxide in bubbles and heat in microwave will form trace amount of sugar.
Also
So in a pan of Carbonated water I put a plastic bottle in water and then lifted the bottle out of water except opening of bottle and with tape mounted to solid surface, holding bottle above water and leaving mouth of bottle in water. Now I got 30 volt power supply and ran two wires(Platinum) into water from each electrode and the one that produced the most bubbles(this is Hydrogen) I let bubble in the bottle and with carbonation bubbling from water, filled the bottle just before it stopped bubbling. After a few days of letting hydrogen bubble into CO2 the gas in the bottle became less and adding more carbonated water to let carbonation refill bottle then letting hydrogen again many times reduce the gas, I added half as much propane to the gas mixture from lighter to the gas and platinum wire with no charge only as catalyst to gas and solution , after a day I got a blackish material on sides of pan!
Now looking at this equation, 2H2 + CO2 + CH4 = C2H6 + 2H2O because to link carbons together it may take two different kinds of carbons. I dried some of the blackish material and lit it with lighter and it burned like an ember(glow red and as it went out a small puff of smoke) Thinking if I oxidized this blackish material a little I may get sugar I left in sun light with water and got a white material as water dried. Re adding water the white material dissolved like sugar, more test need to be done, and is their may be a way to make sugar directly.
6H2 + 18CO2 = C6O6H12 + 6H2O
The equation 3H2 + CO2 + CH4 = C2 + C6 + H2O and its Entropy, 3H2 + CO2 + CH4 (About 750)= C2 + C6 + H2O(About 625)
6H2 + 18CO2 = C6O6H12 + 6H2O
What I am trying to do is turn Carbon Dioxide and water to Sugar and Oxygen but found that 3CO2 +2H2 + C3H8 = C6O6H12 is possible!
Summary of Invention
They have been trying to turn carbon dioxide and water to sugar and oxygen like plant but what I found was what it is possible to make carbon dioxide and hydrogen react. By adding Propane to reactance I was able to get solid oil Blackish material
I am putting two platinum wires connected to a 30DC power supply in bath of carbonated water and letting the Hydrogen one(the one that bubbles the most) bubble into a upside down container full of carbon dioxide. I keep refilling the container by ether adding more carbon dioxide or adding more carbonated water and letting it bubble into the container. After about a week or so, seams to help if I add propane but not sure, I get a blackish material in the bath sides, it burns when dried, possible fungus.
I call this process carbon dioxide hydrogenation
My Comments only, for boyh sides of conversation go to:
http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=71
Missing Neutrinos problem solved - physics reunited
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction to the Neutrino Report
Their was a calculation done about 50 years ago that showed that 1/3 of the neutrino�s from the nuclear reaction of the sun were missing(they measured the neutrino�s from Sun and their were 1/3 less than their should have been from theoretical calculations).
The US government under the impression that a nuclear discovery could be made if truly their was 1/3 of neutrinos really missing, and put Dr. John Bachall in charge of checking all calculations, and to develop a very accurate sensor for sensing neutrinos.
After spending 30 years checking all calculations and building the most accurate neutrino sensor, Dr John Bachall said �yes, 1/3 of the neutrinos are missing from Sun�s nuclear reaction�!
Now upon a close examination of the missing neutrino problem, come to find out that there are many different energy levels of neutrinos and Dr. John Bachall only measured a few of many different neutrino energy levels and assumed the rest of many different energy levels of neutrinos also had 1/3 less than they should.
So they came to think that neutrinos had mass and the high energy level Dr. Bachall was measuring 1/3 of them were oscillating with lower energy neutrinos, on the way here from the Sun, thus Dr. Bachall measured 1/3 less of the high energy neutrinos, but the low energy level neutrinos, that he didn�t check, could have 1/3 more.
Now to check the low energy neutrinos, they built Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada (SNO), and even though the numbers were not quit as they expected, they though they were close enough to say, 1/3 of neutrinos are not missing but, 1/3 of high energy neutrinos are oscillating and buy the time they reach Earth from Sun are low energy neutrinos (but couldn�t account for 100% of neutrinos).
During this time (1987) their was a Super Nova and the neutrinos of explosion and light of explosion arrived at Earth the same time and since light has no mass, neutrinos also must have no mass or they would have arrived at different times.
So if neutrinos have no mass they can�t be oscillating (they must have mass to oscillate), so what is going on here?
A new definition of light must be introduced �Light is gravitational pull being vibrated, and has no mass�. Now with my new definition of light you would expect a change of energy of neutrinos. If a long rope hanging from high point, and the high point represented the gravitational flux at Sun (tight rope) and loose end, the gravitational flux at Earth, you would expect if you plucked the rope at high point that sent a wave down the rope, the nature of wave would change by the time it reached the loss end.
So we are right back where we started from, 1/3 of neutrino are missing from Sun and I say that their is a thing called nuclear force crystal in the core of Sun that is stopping 1/3 of neutrinos (this is atoms that instead of normal chemical bonds, under high pressure have nuclear bonds between nucleases and electron s go around the hole thing making magnetic field), and with its high density can stop a percentage of neutrinos (we don�t know any normal material that will stop a large percentage of neutrinos as they can go through Earth).
I say this nuclear force crystal in core of Sun stops 1/3 of neutrinos on Sun for 11 years and reaches threshold then erupts into Solar Flare and magnetic field of Sun changes, and the same thing happened on Earth (nuclear force crystal in core of Earth reaches threshold and erupts) until the crust got thick stopping eruptions, now we go into ice age during this transition period)
Mathematical Proof
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a Mathematical proof, I calulated the threshold that the Core of Sun reaches per cubic mile of Suns core(The Sun core stores neutrinos for 11 years and can't hold any more and erupts into Solar Flare) divided by 28 (less for Earths gravity to erupt), then calculated the how long it would take Earths core to reach this threshold as Earths core stops .3% neutrinos coming from Sun and I got about 100,000 years, or about the time it took the magnetic field of Earth to reverse before Earths crust got thick.( See Dr Cox magnetic field chart(using radioactive argon), up to about a million years ago the Earths magnetic changed at a steady beat of a little less than 100,000 years)
neutrinos have no mass
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are talking in the range of 100,000 light years distance from super nova! If neutrinos had mass the neutrinos from super nova(which was recorded at two neutrino observatory's) and the light(seeing super nova explode which took 3 hours for it to be big enough to see) would not have arrived at same time.
This is Absolute Proof - Ice Age will start first in North Eastern America
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The heat of neutrinos being blocked in core of Earth keeps the Earths crust at about 65 degrees. Now I say their is a threshold that once reached, the core for a period of time stops blocking neutrinos and crust temperature drops causing an Ice Age(as magnetic field of Earth reverses).
Now since 1/5 of energy of nuclear power plant's is neutrinos, wouldn't make sense for the Earth's core around the North East
America where most Nuclear reactors are, would reach it's
threshold first and go into Ice First? Isn't that what is happening right now, the average temperature is dropping and you are about to see the actual proof.
Dr Dale Cox had his Doctors in Einstein's theory and he was a good teacher
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Dale Cox had his Doctors in Einstein's Theory and he was a good teacher, and didn't talk down to people. Although a different Dr Cox that made magnetic field chart of Earth using radioactive Argon method.
He would start out (not like I did, since I know I can talk down to people) in my responses so far.
He would have started out, you are right, Mathematical proof must be looked at first.
Also right let's go into how much mass a neutrino could have, and with this mass how close could the neutrino come to speed of light with energy it has.
And with that mass how long would it take to travel 100,000 light years.
It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong, the important thing is knowing enough to pull out the math and as teacher he would go through the math.
See the important thing is you continue to learn.
Now we have a crisis here and I am developing synthetic food using electricity (from natural gas or nuclear power) and will be going to chemistry web site.
The mistake I made when talking to Dr Cox was being found of Anti � matter.
Dr Cox said � time can slow down, and stop at speed of light, but go backward , this goes against Einstein, and right Einstein�s theory doesn�t explain everything, but to go against Einstein , you don�t know how solid the theory is.
Einstein proved light has no mass.
Einstein proved light has no mass and standing on that foundation, since neutrinos and photons arrived on Earth at same time, neutrinos have no mass.
The disagreement is you think that their was a differance in time that of when the neutrinos arrived and the light arrived. if their was a differance you might look at a mass possibility. The neutrinos arrived at same time as photons, it took a little time for the explosion to be big enough to be seen.
So it is as simple as neutrino speed = photon speed
Lets look at how Einstein proved light has no mass, give me some time, or look it up yourself. How could something of higher frequency than light have more mass? The higher the frequency the higher the energy. The higher the mass the lower the frequency. Something that had more mass than light would have a lower frequency.
I say there is, due to pressure in the core of Earth a thing called nuclear force crystal. This is instead of chemical bonds, nuclear bonds between nucleases so tight it can stop a small percent neutrinos and that the electrons have to orbit around the whole crystal. That is what we see, a magnetic field of Earth from current flow of orbiting electrons going around the nuclear force crystal.
Not only do I predict nuclear force crystal but have a mathematical foundation. The Sun changes or reverses its magnetic field every 11 years. Using that threshold I have come up with the rate of change of Earths magnetic field.
According to Dr Dale Cox �a new theory must not only explain the scientific data but also predict something new�
muon neutrinos disappear while traversing the earth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The France reactor and others seam to say there is no mass to neutrinos, then a big argument starts that says you are not far enough away to tell(The Buddha said" In the evil latter day of the law, People of authority will lie to keep their high position").
Well lets go all the way through Earth and we find something I could say is is caused by Nuclear Force Crystal, the other side could say it is caused by oscillation.
"Super-Kamiokande results announced in 1998, which showed "the smoking gun" that muon neutrinos disappeared while traversing the earth"
From:http://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~jgl/kamland_faq.html
I wouldn't put money on oil futures yet- I have patent applicition for Synthetic oil
I wouldn't put money on oil futures yet- I have patent application for Synthetic oil. With nuclear power you could make all you want.
Go to http://pair.uspto.gov and look up patent application # 10/270,767
Lets figure the Nuclear Force Crystal thing out, and put your money on united we stand.
I heard it would take a light year of lead to stop all neutrinos, keeping in mind you have a Trillion neutrinos going through your body each second form Sun.
The fast and efficient way to separate water in to hydrogen and Oxygen would be a plasma I would think, but lets use Thermodynamics efficiency equations. I worked on Plasma Reactors at Texas Instruments.
Dr Dale Cox, one of few people alive that has his Doctors in Dr Einsteins General Theory of Relativity,came to Alpine, Texas to teach(Sul Ross University) so he could be next to Observatory that was shooting laser to moon and reflecting it back(via reflector left by apollo mission to moon)to see if space is warped by gravity as Einstein predicted.
He stressed Thermodynamics as something very useful in everyday life, and taught Thermodynamics also. Einstein had a part in the development of Thermodynamics.
http://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=71
The process uses carbon dioxide and water
The process uses carbon dioxide and water. The water is separated into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity, and then the hydrogen is added to carbon dioxide.
When I first started I got a small amount of blackish matter that looked like oil like material and heating with match glowed red and removing match, smoked like an ember.
When the blackish material was mildly oxidized by putting a drop of water and putting in Sun light, turned white like sugar.
I seamed as if I was making oil like material and something like sugar (carbohydrate).
When I made large quantities, I found that the blackish material was a fungus like material that would burn and looks to be able to be distilled to make gasoline.
So I say that the plant uses photosynthesis to produce electricity from photoelectric effect, and the electricity is used to separate the water into Hydrogen and Oxygen and the hydrogen is added to carbon dioxide to make carbon dioxide hydrogenation which a fungus can thrive and make chemicals for the plant. So in every seed there is different fungus, bacteria and algae to make different chemicals for plant, is what I am trying to prove now.
How about feeding carbon dioxide hydrogenated water to alfalfa to stimulate growth, and then feed the alfalfa to cattle?
Getting to the point, they have tryed to duplicate the process of plants(taking carbon dioxide and water and make sugar and oxygen out of it) with little luck. Text books add the photon to carbon dioxide and water to make sugar and oxygen, but from entropy we know that if you add heat to carbon dioxide and water it only increases the entropy and this would make it harder for it to go to the lower entropy of sugar and oxygen(since entropy only increases and never decreases).
Separate water into hydrogen and oxygen and then add the hydrogen to carbon dioxide and now from entropy the reaction comes close to being higher on products side, and if you have some water forming on the products side, with waters high heat capacity, adding heat now would put more entropy on the products side and the reaction will go forward.
Ultimate Strategy Nichiren Daishonin Buddhism
In the lotus sutra, the Buddha said the
curse returns to the originator, please rely on the
exact words of the Buddha, but my interpretation is
what you do comes back to you. So if you save peoples
lives, someone will save your life. The Buddha said
trust law(Namu-Myoho-Renge-Kyo) not persons. So the
person that you save may not save you, but someone
will. The last and hardest thing to do to become
Buddha is to save innumerable people ,once you have
done that your life will be indistructable.
Becouse what you did will come back to you
(saving peoples lives), someone will always be
saving your life, may be not the person
that you saved but someone, trust in law
(Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo), not persons.
Copyright, below, All Rights Reserved.
Point 1. You can carbon dioxide hydrogenated water simply by having carbonation in water(Carbon Dioxide) and the water has a ph or small amount of hydrogen separated from Oxygen and some Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen will combine and produce Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenated water. Heat in microwave and you get a sweet taste.(this is simplest way producing carbohydrates(sugar like) but only small percent in solution.
Point 2. I can make Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenated water by putting a glass upside down in carbonated water(the glass will fill with Carbon Dioxide). Then put two platinum wires on 30 volt DC power supply and the one that bubbles the most is Hydrogen, put it under the glass and let the Hydrogen bubble into the Carbon Dioxide. This will make Carbon Dioxide Hydrogenate and it will go into water.
Point 3 I can bubble propane into glass and the fungus that makes propane and other blackish material will start growing. Or I can take the milk from rubber tree and put in this solution and the fungus that makes rubber will start making rubber.
Point 4. I can get Chlorophyll from the drug store "De Souza's Liquid Chlorophyll Dietary Supplement" and put in carbonated water and put in Sun Light and the Chlorophyll will make a DC current and replace my wires. I put a sample of milk from rubber tree and the fungus that makes rubber will start making rubber. If I take the rubber out of solution the fungus will start eating rubber, as that is why it makes rubber so it will have something to eat latter, I put it back in solution the fungus will start making rubber again .Or if I take a sample of crude oil and put it in the solution the fungus that makes oil (in the crude oil) will start making oil.
So I get a blackish material at bottom of bucket.
So thinking Oil Forming fungus is a thermophile and instead of using Sun light and chlorophyll to make electricity it uses heat and chlorophyll(may have special kind of chlorophyll for heat)to make electricity. The electricity separates water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. The Hydrogen combines with carbon dioxide in water and the Oil forming fungus thrive on carbon dioxide hydrogenate.
So I put large pan of water on electric heater to keep warm and added a drop of crude oil. In about 7 days(Dec/4/04) I started getting a brownish oilish fungus looking material on top of water. So all you have to do to make oil is put a drop of crude from oil well(this has fungus in it that forms oil)in warm water and it will start forming to Oil in 7 days! Just be sure to keep adding water to make up for evaporated water every day.
So there are two ways to make oil, put drop of crude in water bucket, add chlorophyll and put in Sun light, you get blackish substance at bottom of bucket and oil slick on top of water. The second way is to put a drop of crude in pan of water and keep it warm, this makes regular looking oil floating on water, �Let�s do it that way then�.
The amazing thing about the growth of the Oil forming fungus in warm water is that Radioactive decay products of Uranium (Radium mostly and others) form a deposit when water is evaporated. You can take a water deposit(bottom of tea kettle or pan you use to boil water) and put in ultraviolet light in dark room, turn off ultraviolet light and deposit will glow in dark for a few seconds showing it has radioactive decay byproducts. Now this Oil forming fungus is growing in this doposit turning it to oil. Nothing normally grows in this so the oil fungus must have a Anti-Radioation Antibody.
The Bailey Postulate
The Buddha said �life is like a dream, who knows when it will end�
The Great Teacher: Nichiren Daishonin said �It is my wisdom that makes me write theses things down�
Title of Invention; Synthetic Oil and Sugar
Copy Rights, all rights reserved
Background of invention
Five Postulates
Introduction:
They have tried to duplicate the process of plants (taking carbon dioxide and water and make sugar and oxygen out of it) with little luck. Text books add the photon to carbon dioxide and water to make sugar and oxygen, but from entropy we know that if you add heat to carbon dioxide and water it only increases the entropy and this would make it harder for it to go to the lower entropy of sugar and oxygen(since entropy only increases and never decreases).
Point:
Separate water into hydrogen and oxygen and then add the hydrogen to carbon dioxide and now from entropy the reaction comes close to being higher on products side, and if you have some water forming on the products side, with waters high heat capacity, adding heat now would put more entropy on the products side and the reaction will go forward.
Postulate 1, the photosynthesis process is the photo electric effect that separates water into oxygen and hydrogen. It is a microwave frequency and can travel down a stem. There is a bacteria that uses this energy to make sugar.
Postulate 2. The plant carries bacteria in its sap to make chemicals from the sugar.
Postulate 3. You can put sugar in water in microwave that has this sugar making bacteria and it will make sugar.
Postulate 4. You can put sap from plants and trees in 150 degree water with sugar and the bacteria in sap will make chemicals.
Postulate 5.
At lower temp milk will make milk in sugar water, may be at higher temp also, but may have urine that needs to be discharged (keep changing sugar water).
BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION
You can put sugar with sugar making bacteria in water and put in microwave keeping it only warm and it will make sugar.
You can take 150 degree water and put rubber tree sap in water and in couple of weeks or so it will start producing rubber tree sap.
You can put the bacteria from natural Oil in 110 to 150 degree water with sugar and it will make Oil in about 2 months. Keeping the container closed will make the bacteria in Oil use the oxygen�s in the sugars and make it move in the direction of oxygen less hydrocarbons (Natural Oil)
You can put the bacteria from natural Oil in 110 to 150 degree water with cow or horse manure and it will make Oil in about 2 months. Keeping the container closed will make the bacteria in Oil use the oxygen�s in the cellulous sugars and make it move in the direction of oxygen less hydrocarbons (Natural Crude Oil)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF DRAWINGS
Figure 1, making rubber tree sap
Figure 2, making natural Crude Oil
CLAIMS
1. This process can make natural rubber
2. This process can make Natural Crude Oil
3. This process can make many natural saps.
4. This process can make sugar.
ABSTRACT OF DISCLOSURE
It is very hard to make chemicals but if you have bacteria making them for you it is very easy.
You must find the right bacteria, let�s say a sap from a rubber tree. Now you only want the rubber tree sap to grow so you put the temperature to 150 degrees Fahrenheit in sugar water so no other random human bacteria grow. Human or Animal bacteria produce urine and produce a smell but thrive a lower temperature than 150. If you have a smell, turn the temperature up a little and only the rubber tree sap will grow.
Putting the crude oil in warm cow or horse manure, I am using 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit because I am using plastic bottle with lid but use higher temperatures in pan and got faster results.
All my temperatures are in Fahrenheit.
July/11/03
Robert T Bailey E-mail: rtbailey_99@yahoo.com
