1.
Preamble
The proposed theory is conceptually satisfactory and does not need any
abstract mathematical
picture. The theory tells us that there is no electric charge as we
understand it now. The
basic structure of the particle comprise of spinning magnetic rings and
electric charge like
properties of the particle, are due to this spin
Further the dynamical structure of the particle makes it
an electromagnetic system
which has close
resemblance to electromagnetic waves.
Lorentz force law state that force acting on a
moving charged particle in an electromagnetic
field is
(1)
Such force has two components. One is force due to electric field which is
(2)
Second part of force is due to action of magnetic field in which the charge Q moves. This is
(3)
we propose following postulate with the help which we can derive above Eq.(3)
Magnetic field in motion at a point
generates electric field which is equal to cross
product of the magnetic field intensity and its velocity.
In other words , electric field generated due to the
moving magnetic field is
(4)
Suppose there is charge Q moving with the velocity v
in magnetic field B . Relative velocity of B
with respect to Q will then be -v.Then according to postulate Eq.(4), electric field generated
by motion of magnetic field will be
Thus magnetic component of the force
This is same as the force law Eq.(3)
  With the help of the postulate stated above, we can construct a
dynamical system of
  spinning magnetic rings that would give out electric field very much like that emitted
  by electric charge.
Fig-1 shows construction of a typical particle. There we see
that there are two magnetic
field rings OM and
ON each having field intensity B.
Size of the ring is of the order of
m diameter.The field of the
right hand side ring OM
is in clockwise direction whilst the
field of ring ON is counter clockwise. Both the
rings are rotating around their common
tangential
axis X-X¢in the direction as indicated in the
figure. Radius of each ring is r.Since
the rings are
spinning around the axis X-X¢,
velocity of the ring is highest at the tips M and
N.
Let this tip velocity be equal to u.C1and C2are the centres of the two rings ON and
OM
respectively and P1 and P2
are two points arbitrarily chosen on the rings such that
radial lines
C1P1and C2P2
make same angle q with the horizontal. P1N¢and P2M¢are perpendiculars
from points P1 and P2to the horizontal.
At point P1 , the magnetic field
vector B1is tangent to
the circle of the ring and its direction is
as indicated in the figure.
Thus
Let
be the velocity of the ring at point P1. The
velocity
is perpendicular to the page
coming outwards in the direction
of z axis and its value
will be proportional to its distance
from the
axis.
So
![]()
![]()
Therefore, velocity
vector
From Eq (4) we get electric
field E1 generated at the point
P1 due to the motion of magnetic
field
Because
So we have electric field E1 along
the direction of the radius
C1P1 as shown in the
Fig-1.
Same way we can calculate electric field intensity
E2 at the point P2. Here ,
Thus we see that E1and E2are pointing in the same direction. Since the
distance
between the two parallel vectors is of microscopic dimension, we
take the
resultant field as
Therefore
The result is that for any value of angle q ,
the electric field E emitted is same and
its
direction is along the radius. So the
spinning system of Fig-1, when viewed from any
angle from outside lookslike a positively charged particle emitting
uniform electric
field radially in all
spherical directions.
If we reverse the directions of magnetic field of rings
OM
and ON, the spinning system will act
as negatively
charged particle.
The spinning system of Fig-1 also possesses energy. It
should be noted that magnetic field of the
rings has
rest energy, which is proportional to the square of field intensity
B ´ Volume.
The total
energy of the system will be the rest
energy of magnetic field plus kinetic energy of its spin. This
energy constitutes the mass of the system.
Besides it may be noted that such a dynamic system, inspite
of the rotations of its rings, does
not radiate
energy in form of electromagnetic waves because there is no change in electric
field
emitted. Uniformity of electric field is
maintained by the fact that electric field emitted by one
ring in any particular direction is compensated by that of the other
ring in that same direction
such that the constancy
of the field is maintained in all directions. Since the system does
not
radiate or give away its energy, it is a stable
system that keeps its energy to itself.
Thus we can see that the spinning system of Fig-1 is a unique
rotating system that satisfies all
conditions
expected of a particle. Over and above that such dynamic system has
inherent
properties like spin, magnetic moment and
magnetic polarization.
We may state that a sub-atomic particle is a dynamic system
comprising of a pair or pairs of
magnetic rings
rotating around the common tangential axis. It acts as a stable
particle having
(1) Electric Charge (2) Mass (3) Spin
(4) Axis of polarization and (5) Magnetic Moment.
Suppose there
is a particle comprising of a pair of spinning magnetic rings such as shown
in
Fig-1. Let
the frequency of spin be equal to
revolutions per
second.
So long as the
spin frequency is constant, the particle is stable and does not radiate
energy.
However, when the
particle is disturbed by external forces so that its spin frequency is
reduced
from
to say
, then an electromagnetic wave is
emitted by the particle. The
frequency of the wave
or the photon so emitted will be equal to the difference or the
beat
frequency. In
this case it will be
. The energy carried by the photon will be
which
should be same as the
energy lost by the particle. So we may state that if the energy of
a
particle is
initially equal to E then after the loss of a
photon it will be
Now
suppose if the spin frequency is reduced to zero, the particle will loose all
its energy
and vanish.
Then
.This gives
or
Thus we
see that the total energy of the particle is equal to its Spin Frequency ´ Planck’s
Constant.
It may be noted that Eq (14) is derived on the basis of beat frequency
photon
generated due to
the change in the spin frequency.
Here
we see a close link between Particle and Electromagnetic wave. Both
have
common components
namely electric and magnetic fields and both have same equation
for energy i.e.
. In one case the
frequency
is the
frequency of spin and in the other
it is the frequency of the wave.
A particle may
also gain energy when struck by electromagnetic wave or accelerated by
external
forces. In that case spin frequency will increase. In other
words spin frequency
is the overall measure
of particle’s energy.
However the
energy of a particle is
Combining Eq(14) and (15) we get
4. Equivalent Electric
Charge
To calculate equivalent charge of the whole system, we
assume charges q1 and
q2at the
center of each ring as shown in Fig-2. The equation for electric field at a
distance r
(radius of the ring) due to a charge q1is
Here eo is the permittivity of
the medium, q1 is charge at the
center of ring ON and
r is radius of the ring.
For charge q2 of ring OM we get
The net effective electrical intensity due to both rings will be
Here
is
the equivalent charge of the whole system, which will be
Again
Therefore
In terms of diameter of the ring R=2r the equation becomes
5. Equivalent Mass
Since
the energy E of the particle is
we get equivalent mass
of the particle as
![]()
Fig-3 shows two spinning
rings with their thickness d which is the
diameter of its circular
cross-section. Here we can
see that velocity of two tips M and N is
highest. So when the tip
velocity u
is very near to the velocity of light c, the kinetic energy of the tips becomes so high
that the energy of other
parts of the ring becomes insignificant. In other words mass of
the
particle is
mainly concentrated in the two tips M and N.
If E
is the total energy and
is the rest energy of the two tips
then relativistic equation
for the total energy of the tips
become
The
ratio
being very
high, the value of uis almost equal to
c.
So for all
practical purposes we can take
The Eq (20) for equivalent charge then becomes
![]()
This indicates that the diameter of the rings shrinks as the spin frequency
increases.
This is because of the limitations of the tip velocity which cannot exceed the
value of c.
In Sec-4 we saw that
Combining Eq (26) and (27) we get
Thus we see that the diameter of the ring decreases as its mass
increases. This means
that the size of electron must be nearly 2000 times bigger than
proton.
For example when an electron is accelerated so that its total energy is
increased say one
hundred times then its size gets reduced to one hundredth.
This applies to both linear acceleration as well as circular motion. As the
particle gains
speed, its size decreases.
Then total magnetic flux in the ring cross-section will be
Charge of the particle
From Eq (24) and (29),
we get
The right hand side of the equation is constant because ratio
is
constant.
Thus
Thus we see that so long as the flux of the ring
is constant, the charge of the
particle
remains same irrespective of change in its mass.
Here m is the relativistic mass, which is
concentrated near the tips M and N of rings
(see Fig-3), u is the tip velocity which is equal to
the speed of light c and
R is the radius
of rotation, which is equal to the diameter of the ring.
![]()
Therefore, its spin frequency
The diameter of the magnetic ring of the electron will be
The electron charge
Coulomb. From this we can
work out flux
density
with the
help of Eq (24)
It may be noted that magnetic intensity of ring is quite high compared to the
intensities
of magnetic fields that we find in ordinary magnets.
The diameter of the proton ring will be
We can find the flux density of proton ring
In all probability, proton is a multi-pair particle i.e. the
particle with more than one pair
of spinning rings. In that case, the values worked out as above may
need correction.
Neutron must be a multi-pair particle. Simplest form we can imagine
comprises of two
pairs. One pair generates positive electric field and the other negative
electric field of the
same magnitude. The two fields cancel one another and the particle
behaves like an
electrically neutral
one.
Neutron may have more than two pairs of rings. Some pairs generate
positive field and
others generate negative field. Sum total of all the fields is
zero.
14. Mass less Particles
Multi-Pair particles are those having more than one pair of spinning
rings. Neutron is just
one example of such multi-pair particle. Most of the heavy particles are
likely to be
multi-pair particles. Such particles may have any number of pairs
of rings, not just two.
For example a neutron may have as many as three pairs. Let us suppose
each pair has its
own charge and mass. Say
are the charges of each individual pair and
are
corresponding mass values.
Then
because neutron is electrically neutral. Its mass will be
During collision the pairs separate, resulting into several fragments. In
the above example,
there will be three fragments.
It is interesting to note that a multi-pair particle of positive charge can have
a negatively
charged component also. That is how we find positive and negative
fragments of a particle
which was originally just a positive one.
16. Magnetic Moment of a Particle
This
equation has been derived on the basis of loop current ´area of the loop. We now
know that magnetic moment is the torque produced due to magnetic dipole field of
the rings
of the particle interacting with external magnetic field in which the particle
is placed. It is like
the torque experienced by a magnetic needle placed in a magnetic field.
So we may translate
above Eq (43) in terms of the magnetic flux of the rings and their
diameters.
We substitute values for
From Eq (28) we get
Magnetic flux of the ring is
![]()
The quantity in the bracket [ ] is a constant because R/d is constant as stated in
the Sec-9 earlier. So we see what is obvious. Magnetic moment
being the torque
experienced by a particle when placed in an external magnetic field is
proportional to
the total flux
of
the rings ´total width
17. Magnetic Moment of Multi-pair Particle
For a multi-pair particle, magnetic moment of the particle will be sum of
moments of
Individual pairs. Let us take an example of a neutral particle described
in Sec- (14). Here
Total electric charge is
. The magnetic moment will be
The expression in the bracket above need not necessarily be zero because ratios
of
charge to
Mass of individual pairs may not be same. This explains why a neutron,
which
is
electrically Neutral has non-zero magnetic moment. Same argument applies
to other
multi-pair
particles wherein their equivalent electric charge and their magnetic moment are
not
in same
proportion
18. Electric Charge
We now know that there is nothing like electric charge carried by a particle. It
is the charge
like properties of spinning magnetic rings.
An important fact that we have been observing all the time, is that electric
charge can never
be separated from matter. The magnetic ring theory tells us the reason why it is
so.
We have been dealing with electric charge since centuries. So we cannot
eliminate the notion
of the charge. We have to continue with it as equivalent charge just the way we
have been
continuing with the direction of electric current from positive to negative
although we know
that in reality the flow is in the reverse direction.
19. Point Charge
One of the riddles posed by electric charge is about infinite magnitude of force
that acts
between two point charges when brought close to one another. Now when we look to
the
structure of particle (fig-1), we see that there is nothing like point charge.
The particle emits
electric field from peripheries of its magnetic rings. The force between two
particles never
blows to infinity however, small is the distance between them.
20. Interaction at close distance
One interesting aspect of magnetic ring theory is that the electric field
radiated by the particle
is not uniform when viewed from close distance – distance comparable to
the size of the
particle. Vector sum of E1and E2(see Fig-1) is not equal to (E1 + E2 ) at that
small distance.
Therefore, the inverse square law does not apply when separation between two
particles is comparable to there size. In that case the force between the
particles becomes
a complicated interaction between the fields of two particles.
21. Conclusion
The Magnetic Ring Theory as described here may not be complete by itself. It may
need
modifications as it develops. However basic idea of replacement of electric
charge by
dynamic system solves many problems that hitherto remained paradoxical. The
theory answers
in simple mathematical terms almost all question about subatomic particles. It
is conceptually
satisfactory. It explains :
1) Significance of mysterious spin and its spin frequency.2) Close link between particle and electromagnetic waves.
3) Magnetic moment and magnetic polarization of the particle.
4) Size and shape of sub-atomic particles. We now know that heavier particles
are smaller in size.5) Constancy of electric charge.
6) Mass is all energy which is mostly kinetic energy.
7) Annihilation of Electron/Positron pair and its conversion to Electromagnetic Waves.
15-Jan-2001
Ó 2000