*** Source: New Statesman (1996), Oct 23, 1998 v127 n4408 p35(2). Title: Velvet Goldmine._(movie reviews) Author: Jonathan Romney Subjects: Motion pictures - Reviews People: Haynes, Todd Meyers, Jonathan Rhys McGregor, Ewan Rev Grade: A Electronic Collection: A21262305 RN: A21262305 Full Text COPYRIGHT 1998 Statesman and Nation Publishing Company Ltd. (UK) "Although what you are about to see is a work of fiction," teasingly announce the opening titles to Velvet Goldmine, "it should be played at full volume." Todd Haynes's extraordinary panorama of the glamrock years seems certain to face resistance from British audiences, who usually like to know for sure whether they're dealing with fact or fiction. Besides, its hyper-camp polysexual pitch flies violently in the face of 1990s rock-geezer culture. It won't pull the Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels audience, that's for sure. This is not the real glam story, though. Instead of a David Bowie biopic, it's a fantasy about a Bowie-esque young thing called Brian Slade (Jonathan Rhys Meyers), who enjoys a torrid romance with American star Curt Wild (Ewan McGregor), closely modelled on Iggy Pop. Bowie-ires may well hate the film, not only for its cartoon image of the True Facts, but also because Haynes presents his hero as a confused opportunist, a cultural magpie cribbing indiscriminately from a multitude of role models, before cashing in his chips for the conformist rock dreams of the 1980s. Velvet Goldmine should be read as a fantasy, and like the best fantasies, it's fabulously superficial at first sight, before revealing hidden depths and resonances. It uses the Bowie story much as Slade uses the images of history. This is a fan's dream of pop history, by a director who was too young to be in the thick of it at the time. Although Velvet Goldmine has been touted as a British film, because of its stars and Film on Four's production involvement, it's very much an American director's fantasy about Englishness - a rifling, at transatlantic arm's length, of motifs from pop's past and the gay history that informed it. The references run from Oscar Wilde, through music hall drag, through the parlare slang of 1960s gay subculture, to the short-lived revolution of glam's mascara-masquerade. Velvet Goldmine is in every sense a made-up story about made-up people. Like Bowie, Slade invents himself piecemeal, but that hardly invalidates him or makes him less "authentic" - a word which has never been much use in pop history. Ever since emerging in the early 1990s as a front runner in what was briefly hailed as the "New Queer Cinema", Todd Haynes has shown a cultural analyst's eye for the paradoxes of identity and the prerogatives of fantasy. His debut feature, Poison, was inspired by Jean Genet, the high priest of transgressive self-invention and another Bowie hero. In Velvet Goldmine, he mischievously alludes to his early short Superstar, a biopic of Karen Carpenter acted out by Barbie dolls. A young girl plays with two boy dolls customised in the guise of Brian and Curt, who declare their passion before falling into a clinch. That, Haynes reminds us, is what fan fantasy is for - a way of possessing your idols by turning them into your personal toys. The stars in this story are like puppets - of the media, of their audiences, of each other. And, as such, we can't expect them to have any "depth". At a press conference, Slade dazzles with flashes of lapidary philosophical wit - until you realise that the words are all Oscar Wilde's, and that he's reading them from cue cards. Velvet Goldmine is similarly composed of quotations. It's a gaudy patchwork of different film stock, camera styles, spot-on soundtrack pastiches, and wildly differing styles of performance - Rhys Meyers' fazed-Narcissus blankness, Eddie Izzard's punchy Tin Pan Alley hucksterism, Toni Collette's vampy archness as Slade's wife. And central to a film that is justifiably infatuated with look is Sandy Powell's wardrobe, the whole gamut from catwalk dazzle to Oxfam satin-and-tat. Velvet Goldmine recognises that pop revolutions are invariably short-lived and their seismic effects often denied by the very people that caused them. The polysexual youthquake that Slade heralds has its phoney side, too: the film is good on the way that conformist youth culture latched on to Bowie's bisexuality as a flag of convenience, and the extras casting is rife with what used to be derided as the "mascara'd brickie" look. And, although it's not referred to directly, you can't help remembering how glam's direct descendant, punk, rejected its sexual complexity like a puritanical teenager disowning a scandalous aunt. This flamboyantly complex film can be taken in different ways: as a giddy fan letter, as a serious essay in gay cultural archaeology, as stretching the language of pop cinema beyond the MTV cliches. But even the fact that it often seems superficial and cartoonish should be applauded - this is pure cinematic dandyism, too rare in these downbeat screen days. You'll learn next to nothing about the real history of glam, but a lot about why 1970s teenagers embraced the risque pleasures of expensive guitars and cheap eyeliner. "Velvet Goldmine" (18) opens on 23 October at selected cinemas nationwide. --END--