Welcome to the Missouri Wall of Shame,
the online home for Missouri's South-Hating Culture Bigots. In order to make
it on "The Wall" you have to be a major player in Missouri's national or state
politics having played a part in Missouri's removal of the Confederate Flags
at Higginsville Confederate Cemetery or Fort Davidson at Pilot Knob Missouri.
Other members have earned their place on "The Wall" by either endorsing Former
Governor Bob Holden and Former U.S. Representative Dick Gephardt's actions
concerning Missouri's Southern Heritage. Or in the case of Paul Sander, openly
display disdain for Missouri's Confederate veterans in general. You will find both Republicans and
Democrats alike on this wall, there is no party bias.
The 1'st South -Hater to earn a place on The
Wall is Former Representative Richard "Dick" Gephardt.
#1 Dick Gephardt: Former
U.S. Congressman from Missouri DUMPED!
It
really was a toss-up between Gephardt and Bob Holden. Really it is like the
age old question of "What came first; the chicken or the egg". I decided it
was the egg. After all it was Gephardt's comments that hatched the idea of
removing Missouri's Confederate flags. While unofficially launching his 2004
Presidential bid in South Carolina Gephardt called the Confederate Flag.
On January 14,2003 in a Fox News online
article found by
clicking on this link, Gephardt was quoted as saying,
"My own personal feeling is that the Confederate flag no
longer has a place flying any time, anywhere in our great nation."
This lead to a snow-ball like chain of
events that soon brought down Missouri's Confederate Flags. The same January
14, 2003, Fox News article pretty much summed up the whole situation in a
nutshell:
"Mary
Still, spokeswoman for Gov. Bob Holden, said she called Natural Resources
Director Steve Mahfood after reading an Associated Press story about
Gephardt's statement.
"I told Steve it seemed to me it wouldn't be
appropriate to have it flying on a flagpole, but that I didn't know all of
their considerations and I left it in his lap," Still said. She said the
governor, a former Gephardt aide, didn't know about the conversation."
But Holden did know and ultimately it was
under his direction that the flags stayed down.
But an article entitled "Confederate
Flag in Higginsville Sparks Controversy" found in the Thursday June 9th,
2005 edition of the Marshall Democrat-News stated that: "The flag had flown
daily at the site until January 2003 when former Gov. Bob Holden placed an
administrative order which removed it from Higginsville and the Fort Davidson
State Historic Site in Pilot Knob." For this reason Former Governor
"Back-Door" Bob Holden is the #2 man on Missouri's Wall of Shame.
#2 "Back Door" Bob Holden: Former
Missouri Governor DUMPED!

But Holden could not have brought down the flags without
some help from his friends and subordinates.
As the Fox News article stated it was Marry Still Former
Spokesperson for Former Governor Bob Holden called Former Missouri Director of
Natural resources Steve Mahfood and told him about the Confederate Flags
flying in Missouri.
Therefore , Marry Still and Steve Mahfood became the
third and fourth members of the Missouri Wall of Shame.
#3 Marry Still Former Spokesperson
for Former Governor Bob Holden DUMPED!
(sorry no picture available)
"I told Steve it seemed to me it wouldn't be
appropriate to have it flying on a flagpole"-Marry Still
#4 Steve Mahfood Former Director of
Missouri Department of Natural Resources DUMPED !

"Confederate flags were removed from Missouri’s two
Civil War historic sites in January 2003 when
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Director Steve Mahfood ordered them taken down."
- Vox Magazine
#5 Catherine Hanaway Former Speaker of
the House, State of Missouri DUMPED!

Catherine Hanaway killed the first attempt at
legislation that would have restored the Confederate Flags at Higginsville and
Pilot Knob. Rumor has it, that she considered restoring the honor to our
ancestors' grave sites as a "Third Rail".
She ran for Secretary of State in Missouri in 2004 and
lost. Why did Hanaway block the Missouri Legislature's first attempt to
restore Missouri's Confederate Flags?
The answer can be found in a December 16, 2003 Missouri
Digital News article, in which Hanaway was quoted as saying that she had been
"eyeing the secretary of state position for over a decade" Perhaps she
thought that doing what was right would hurt her election chances, instead she
got "dumped with all of the other South-Haters in 2004.
#6 Paul Sander DUMPED!

In February ,2005, Sanders had a choice to make. He
could have either went with his initial instinct and help honor Missouri
Confederate William Jeffers, or he could "play it safe" and be bullied by the
Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU. No doubt running for Cape Girardeau,
Missouri County Clerk was already on his mind when he sided with the "South
Haters"
I guess it can best be summed up in this Letter to the
Editor which appeared in the Southeast Missourian on August 13, 2006 entitled:
"A Theory about Sander's Defeat".
"To the editor:
The Southeast Missourian carried an
article on the unexpected defeat of Jackson Mayor Paul Sander in his bid to
become the next Cape Girardeau County clerk stating: "Conventional wisdom
suggested that Sander, latest in a family line of officeholders, would be a
formidable if not unbeatable candidate." The same article also quotes Cape
Girardeau Mayor (and Sander crony) Jay Knudtson, who stated, "What led to
Clark's lopsided victory is only speculation."
I have my own theory. In February
2005 I was attempting to win approval from the Jackson Board of Aldermen to
erect a Missouri battle flag in honor of Col. William Jeffers. The effort
was derailed by a hit piece from the Southern Poverty Law Center that was
printed in the Southeast Missourian. I wrote my own letter in response to
clear up any misconceptions about me.
When I addressed Mayor Sander and
the board of aldermen, I quoted heavily from the Morris Dees fact sheet
found at the following Web address:
www.patriotist.com/dees.htm.
It exposes many unknown facts about the organization. However, it was clear
their minds were made up.
Among those who spoke in opposition
to honoring Colonel Jeffers was one of the biggest liberal organizations in
America, the ACLU. During the entire time the ACLU representative was
speaking, Mayor Sander was smiling, nodding in approval.
Sanders can now join the ranks of
other South-hating ex-politicians from Missouri: Gov. Bob Holden, U.S. Rep.
Richard Gephardt and Speaker of the House Catherine Hanaway.
CLINT E. LACY, Marble Hill, Mo.
"
# 7 Former U.S. Senator "Chicken" Jim Talent
DUMPED!
As
a newly elected Senator in 2003, Jim Talent had his whole career ahead of him.
Yet when Governor Bob Holden removed Missouri's two Confederate flags in Jan.
,2003 Senator Talent chose to side with him and Richard Gephardt.
The Jan. 26, 2003 the St. Louis Post-Dispatch newspaper published Jim Talent's
views on Governor Holden's decision:
"
His personal
belief is that flags flying over official government property should be
symbols of unity, not symbols of division."
Talent went even further. "I think it's appropriate to
take them down," he said in an interview Friday.
"The flag is intertwined in people's minds with what
was the greatest injustice in the history of our country," Talent explained.
"You can put up some other memorial to the courage of the people who fought
for that cause. But the flag is, to many people, a symbol of injustice. That
war is associated with slavery. When you have a substantial number of people
feeling that way, it should come down."
In effect, Talent is siding with Holden and the state's
presidency-seeking congressman, Rep. Richard Gephardt, D-St. Louis County.
Gephardt touched off the controversy when he'd declared that the Confederate
flag had no business flying anywhere."
On the eve of the 2006
mid-term elections South Carolina's "The State Newspaper" reported on Friday,
November 03, 2006 that:
" Missouri Senate
battle likely to rest on southern, rural turnout"
"The State" went on to say that:
" SPRINGFIELD, Mo. -- Most people pronounce it
Mizzou-ree, but the hard-fought Missouri U.S. Senate race is likely to be won
where they say Mizzour-rah -- the southern and rural parts of the state."
On November 7th, 2006 despite having a heavy financial
advantage over his Democratic opponent, Claire McCaskill, and despite
launching a very negative campaign against her, Jim Talent's short lived
Senate career was over. As it turns out, "The State" newspaper's prediction
was exactly on target.
On Wed. November 8th, 2006 , just one day after the
election, Time.Com reported that:
"Going
"Behind Enemy Lines" Was the Key to McCaskill's Missouri Senate Win:
It wasn't enough to carry Democratic strongholds, so the Democrat ran
hard in conservative areas to trim Jim Talent's advantage"Time
continued by reporting that:
"When the political pros saw the numbers coming in from the rural
counties, they pretty much knew McCaskill was going to win," said Jake
Zimmerman, a longtime Democratic Party activist who won a seat in the
Missouri Senate Tuesday.
And exit polls suggest that the Bush Administration and its handling
of the Iraq war also weighed heavily on voters' minds. "What brought Talent
down wasn't Talent," said pollster and Saint Louis University political
science professor Ken Warren. "There's no question about it, this was a
referendum on the Bush Administration."
There can be no doubt that the unpopularity of the
Bush administration and the Iraq War had played key factors in Talent's
defeat, however; with the race resting on the rural and Southern areas of
voters, the argument can be made that in a race in which 1% determined who
would be Missouri's next U.S. Senator, many of the votes that went to McCaskill were the same votes that crossed party lines in 2004 to vote for
Claire McCaskill in that year's Democratic primary and "Dump" Governor Holden. Those same voters no doubt
remembered Jim Talent's betrayal of Conservative and Southern values
in 2003. Time.Com was correct, what defeated Talent, was Talent.
Click Here to Visit
Show Me South!
#8 Missouri House Speaker Rod Jetton

The
Missouri Wall of Shame welcomes House Speaker Jetton as its newest member.
If you think he looks guilty of something in the picture on the left, it is
because he is!
The tragic fact
of the matter is that House Speaker Jetton used to be considered
a friend to the Southern voter and to Southern heritage, having promised me in
early 2003 that our flags at Higginsville and Pilot Knob would soon be
restored after "Back Door Bob" Holden removed them.
I took him at his
word, but after a couple of years, started to question his sincerity. The
Republicans always seem to manage to get the bill on the House floor at the
last day of the session every year. The liberals from St. Louis scream
racism, the Republicans back down and table it for the following year having
never risked any "political capital" yet going back home to their constituents
and telling them that they supported the flag restoration.
I wanted to place
House Speaker Jetton here a couple of years ago, but was reluctant because a
lobbyist kept asking me not to because Jetton was "a friend". (Which brings me
to my next point; Why should it take a lobbyist to get an elected official to
do what's morally right?)
I don't think
anyone on this list has worked harder to get to the Missouri Wall of Shame
than Rod Jetton has.
On Tuesday,
Feb. 16. , 2007 the Southeast Missourian newspaper published an article that I
had written defending Rod Jetton’s actions toward State Rep. Scott Lipke ( R )
–Jackson.
Jetton had
been getting a lot of “heat” for stripping Scott Lipke of all leadership
positions. Even though I supported Jetton’s opponent, Michael Winder last
November, I thought Jetton did the right thing by stripping Lipke of his
leadership positions, because I felt Lipke had attempted to deceive the public
when he removed language from Missouri Law that lifted the ban on homosexual
acts in Missouri.
It now
appears to me that House Speaker Jetton has also been deceiving the public as
well. For instance did you know that House Speaker Jetton has co-sponsored
legislation that would require Missouri to apologize for its role in slavery?
Neither did I until a friend emailed me the information.
The bill is
HCR-26, introduced by Representative Talibibdin El-Amin , a St. Louis
Democrat. HCR-26 was offered on February 8th of this year and
referred to committee on February 27th.
HCR-26 ,
among other things calls for Missouri to:
“Whereas,
the perpetual pain, distrust, and bitterness of many African Americans could
be assuaged and the principles espoused by the Founding Fathers would be
affirmed, and great strides toward unifying all Missourians and inspiring the
nation to acquiesce might be accomplished if the State of Missouri
acknowledged and atoned
for its role in the slavery of Africans:
Now, therefore, be it
resolved that the members of the
House of Representatives of the Ninety-fourth General Assembly, First Regular
Session, the Senate concurring therein, hereby formally apologize for the
State of Missouri's role in slavery.”
The same friend that informed me
about House Speaker Jetton’s latest folly also noted that there might be a
reason for the language used in this bill. According to my friend:
“Atone
per Mr. Webster is defined as 'Reparation for an offense or injury"
Perhaps
the real motive for Rep. El-Amin’s bill is reparations. Personally some wrong
directions took me right through the heart of El-Amin’s St. Louis district
last summer and it is a down-trodden, economically deprived area. I don’t
think an apology is going to change that.
Four
years ago House Speaker Jetton promised me he would get our Confederate flags
restored in Higginsville and Pilot Knob. It never happened. When asked what
the problem was, he would tell me that St. Louis liberals were responsible for
blocking the legislation.
If St.
Louis liberals are our political enemy, what does that make Jetton, given the
fact that he has now politically allied himself with one? Where do the
apologies stop?
Will
Missouri apologize for the way Southerners were treated during the war and
Reconstruction? After all historian Albert Castel once called General Ewing’s
Order #11:
“the most
drastic and repressive military measure directed against civilians by the
Union Army during the Civil War. In fact, with the exception of the
hysteria-motivated herding of Japanese-Americans into concentration camps
during World War II, it stands as the harshest treatment ever imposed on
United States citizens under the plea of military necessity in our nation's
history."
Will
Missouri apologize for its treatment of the Mormons in the 1830’s?
Will
Missouri apologize for its treatment of the Indians?
It is
doubtful; there is no political capital in these acts. It is also doubtful
that you will see House Speaker Jetton ever petition the federal government to
apologize for its treatment of the American Indian, the invasion of Missouri
and the subsequent occupation / Reconstruction of its citizens.
Rumor
has it that House Speaker Jetton has his eyes on the Governor’s mansion, which
might explain his new alliance with Representative El-Amin. If you are as mad
as I am about Jetton’s attempted deception of Missouri’s citizens than call
his office at:
573.751.5912
and let
him know he should apologize to us !