| <> N. Talwar> One of the key features of the current
economic discourse in
Rural He was followed by the Finance minister, who, in his budget speech announced that 80bn rupees ($1.8bn) will be spent on building rural infrastructure and flow of funds to agriculture will be increased by 30%.> <> The
government (of What is most striking is that land ownership, especially by the tillers, is no more broached in the discussion of agrarian question by the government, the UPA partners or the policy advisors. The entire agrarian question is presented as if capitalist ownership of land is a fait accompli and growth is the only objective. Input costs and labor costs are the variables to produce agricultural goods for the market. President's "Bharat Nirman" announcement, his "Vision 2020" blueprint, Finance minister's budget proposals and policy statements place major emphasis on input to capitalist agriculture. Irrigation, electrification, fertilizer and pesticide, information technology to aid soil-nutrient and water management, climate modeling etc. are presented as input costs to improve farm productivity and state is called upon to bear these expenses, akin to public sector paradigm of the 1950's India. Food processing, cold storage, transport, etc. would help agricultural output to be market driven and private-public investment in these areas are being proposed. The state is taking up new taxation policy, including VAT to create an integrated market and also pay for the state investment. Rise of capitalist monopolies in wholesale and retail trade is already underway and the policies are meant to accelerate that process as well. > <> Wherever tiller has gotten possession of the land he or she tills, productivity gains have been accompanied by new capital infusion as well as intensification of labor of the land proprietor. The surplus value generated through the intensification of the labor of the tiller has become the main reason for his or her increased indebtedness. Agricultural input owners, lending institutions, traders and governments (though tax policy) have stepped up their demands for a share of the wealth produced by the tiller because of any gains in productivity. The surplus generated by the agrarian sector has once again become a major component of the domestic capital accumulation (reflected in the national savings rate) on which Indian industrialists and big business houses are basing their ambitions for world power status. It is important to recognize that it will be
in the interest
of the farmers and rural farm workers to stop this integration of
agriculture
to market mechanisms and "growth" as it will deepen their
exploitation by the agro-monopolies and agro-financiers. The rural
households,
who have not yet succeeded in throwing off the oppression by landlords,
will be
ruined further by the demand of capital to transform not just the
agricultural
produce but the families engaged in agriculture to commodities,
stripping them
of the ability to even resist such onslaught because of lack of any
organization in the villages. Already farmers suicides are on the rise
and only
one can imagine what will happen when crop failure due to water
scarcity or unexpected
pest attacks could expose entire regions of rural |